747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12789142)
1. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery.
Harada K; Kikuchi T; Morishima S; Sato M; Ohkura K; Omura K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 12789142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in occlusal force after mandibular ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 17239561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment.
Baek SH; Ahn HW; Kwon YH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 20186090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of single- or double-jaw surgery on vertical dimension in skeletal Class III patients.
Enacar A; Taner T; Manav O
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11563393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in oropharyngeal airway and respiratory function during sleep after orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Hasebe D; Kobayashi T; Hasegawa M; Iwamoto T; Kato K; Izumi N; Takata Y; Saito C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jun; 40(6):584-92. PubMed ID: 21371862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation.
Kor HS; Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e230-8. PubMed ID: 24954529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy for occlusal cant correction surgery and maxillary advanced surgery.
Ueki K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Yoshida K; Shimizu C; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jul; 104(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17368058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of masticatory function after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with mandibular prognathism.
Kikuta T; Hara I; Seto T; Yoshioka I; Nakashima T; Yasumitsu C
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 8006486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery.
Hwang SJ; Haers PE; Seifert B; Sailer HF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 14980592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients.
Chew MT
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):959-63. PubMed ID: 16448238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
Ricard D; Ferri J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite.
Choi SH; Cha JY; Park HS; Hwang CJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 26518527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
