These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12789159)

  • 1. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
    Couture RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality in partially erased DenOptix storage phosphor plates.
    Lopes SL; Cruz AD; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18425250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The DenOptix digital radiographic system.
    Menig JJ
    J Clin Orthod; 1999 Jul; 33(7):407-10. PubMed ID: 10535024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
    Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions.
    Martins MG; Haiter Neto F; Whaites EJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12917285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does signal fade on photo-stimulable storage phosphor imaging plates when scanned with a delay and what is the effect on image quality?
    Ang DB; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 17052646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
    Berkhout WE; Beuger DA; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15140814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
    Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of ambient lighting intensity and duration on the signal-to-noise ratio of images from photostimulable phosphor plates processed using DenOptix and ScanX systems.
    Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 15585807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal.
    Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 12820852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.