126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12789922)
1. Histopathologic correlation of atypical parakeratosis diagnosed on cervicovaginal cytology.
Abramovich CM; Wasman JK; Siekkinen P; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(3):405-9. PubMed ID: 12789922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis.
Lonky NM; Navarre GL; Saunders S; Sadeghi M; Wolde-Tsadik G
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):716-20. PubMed ID: 7724102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histocytological study of squamous atypia on Pap smears.
Abu-Jawdeh GM; Trawinski G; Wang HH
Mod Pathol; 1994 Dec; 7(9):920-4. PubMed ID: 7892161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Squamous intraepithelial lesions arising in benign endocervical polyps: a report of 9 cases with correlation to the Pap smears, HPV analysis, and immunoprofile.
Chin N; Platt AB; Nuovo GJ
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Oct; 27(4):582-90. PubMed ID: 18753960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry of postirradiation cervicovaginal smears.
Davey DD; Zaleski S; Sattich M; Gallion H
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9500647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endocervical curettage when colposcopic examination is satisfactory and normal.
Williams DL; Dietrich C; McBroom J
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):801-3. PubMed ID: 10831970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears. A study with cytohistologic correlation.
Burja IT; Thompson SK; Sawyer WL; Shurbaji MS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 10349361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow up of atypical squamous cell Pap smears in Iraqi women.
Pity IS; Shamdeen MY; Wais SA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(7):3455-60. PubMed ID: 22994777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of liquid-based gynecologic cytology on an HIV-positive population.
Swierczynski SL; Lewis-Chambers S; Anderson JR; Keller JM; Hinkle DA; Ali SZ
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 15085748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patients with epithelial cell abnormality in PAP smears: correlation of results with follow-up smears and cervical biopsies.
Türkmen IÇ; Başsüllü N; Korkmaz P; Günenç B; Baykal CM; Güdücü N; Işçı H; Dünder I; Doğusoy GB
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2013; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 24022307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PAPNET-directed rescreening of cervicovaginal smears: a study of 101 cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Ryan MR; Stastny JF; Remmers R; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Frable WJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 8659445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of hyperkeratosis in pap smears with squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Izadi-Mood N; Sarmadi S; Alijani S; Sanii S
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(4):379-82. PubMed ID: 22846642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): characteristics and histologic outcomes.
Sherman ME; Castle PE; Solomon D
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):298-305. PubMed ID: 16544318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
