126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12789922)
21. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
Geier CS; Wilson M; Creasman W
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jan; 184(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 11174481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection in women 50 years and older with squamous cell papanicolaou test abnormalities.
Zhao C; Zhao S; Heider A; Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20670132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cervical parakeratosis/hyperkeratosis as an important cause for false negative results of Pap smear and human papillomavirus test.
Xiao GQ; Emanuel PO
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jun; 49(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 19566565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Frequency of cervical smear abnormalities within 3 years of normal cytology.
Sawaya GF; Kerlikowske K; Lee NC; Gildengorin G; Washington AE
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 96(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 10908766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reporting of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) on cervical samples: is it significant?
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 12827715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cytological characteristics of premalignant cervical epithelial lesions in postmenopausal women based on endocrine indices and parakeratosis.
Sugisawa A; Toyoda Z; Tanabe Y; Uehara K; Oshiro A; Yamazato R; Sakamoto C; Yogi S; Kurima K; Kina S; Sakiyama M; Kinjo T
Menopause; 2023 Feb; 30(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 36696644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cytologic and histologic review of atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected during cervical cytology screening.
Jeng CJ; Liang HS; Wang TY; Shen J; Yang YC; Tzeng CR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 12911731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Glandular and squamous atypia and intraepithelial lesions in atrophic cervicovaginal smears. One institution's experience.
Acs G; Gupta PK; Baloch ZW
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 10934955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ-from Papanicolaou test to hysterectomy: a series of 74 cases.
Lashmanova N; Braun A; Cheng L; Gattuso P; Yan L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 34509373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): clinical considerations and cytohistologic correlation.
Nasuti JF; Fleisher SR; Gupta PK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Mar; 26(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 11892026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Atypical parakeratosis: a marker of dysplasia?
Voytek TM; Kannan V; Kline TS
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Nov; 15(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 8982582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical implication of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with or without favoring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smears.
ChangChien CC; Lin H; Eng HL; Chang WK
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 10695204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Determination of features indicating progression in atypical squamous cells with undetermined significance: human papillomavirus typing and DNA ploidy analysis from liquid-based cytologic samples.
Bollmann R; Méhes G; Torka R; Speich N; Schmitt C; Bollmann M
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 12704691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Significance of AGUS Pap smears in pregnant and postpartum women.
Chhieng DC; Elgert P; Cangiarella JF; Cohen JM
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 11393057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
