These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12789972)

  • 1. Direct composite resins: an update.
    Kugel G; Perry R
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jul; 23(7):593-6, 598, 600 passim; quiz 608. PubMed ID: 12789972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct and indirect adhesive restorative materials: a review.
    Kugel G
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):35D-40D. PubMed ID: 11763916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system.
    Estafan D; Agosta C
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 15055646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of conditioner and restorative resin on enamel bond strengths.
    Perdigão J; Geraldeli S; Heymann HO; Rosa BT
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 11764833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The controlled placement and delayed polymerization technique for the direct Class 2 posterior composite restoration.
    Atlas AM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Nov; 26(11):812-8, 820-2. PubMed ID: 16300237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars.
    el-Kalla IH
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10477997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature.
    Burgess JO; Walker R; Davidson JM
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):465-79. PubMed ID: 12412962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system.
    Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Koike T; Yukitani W; Hisamitsu H; Wakumoto S; Fujishima A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 10823080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of different repair procedures on bond strength of adhesive filling materials to etched enamel in vitro.
    Hannig C; Hahn P; Thiele PP; Attin T
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):800-7. PubMed ID: 14653297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.