195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12789976)
1. Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain onlays: a 4-year report.
Barghi N; Berry TG
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jul; 23(7):657-60, 662, 664 passim; quiz 674. PubMed ID: 12789976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
Krämer N; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective evaluation of a series of dentin-bonded ceramic crowns.
Burke FJ; Qualtrough AJ; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 9643243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement.
Ibarra G; Johnson GH; Geurtsen W; Vargas MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 16499961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study.
Naeselius K; Arnelund CF; Molin MK
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18350945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Etched-porcelain resin-bonded onlay technique for posterior teeth.
Yatani H; Watanabe EK; Kaneshima T; Yamashita A; Suzuki K
J Esthet Dent; 1998; 10(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 10321203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Posterior ceramic bonded partial restorations].
Mainjot A; Vanheusden A
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2006; 61(2):77-95. PubMed ID: 17432532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages.
van Dijken JW; Hasselrot L
Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):929-39. PubMed ID: 20691334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
