349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12790079)
1. [Antifungal susceptibility of yeasts by Etest. Comparison of 3 media].
Tapia C; León E; Palavecino E
Rev Med Chil; 2003 Mar; 131(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 12790079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Antifungal susceptibility for Candida albicans isolated from AIDS patients with oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis: experience with Etest].
Tapia C; González P; Pereira A; Pérez J; Noriega LM; Palavecino E
Rev Med Chil; 2003 May; 131(5):515-9. PubMed ID: 12879812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro susceptibility of Candida species to five antifungal agents in a German university hospital assessed by the reference broth microdilution method and Etest.
Fleck R; Dietz A; Hof H
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Apr; 59(4):767-71. PubMed ID: 17293369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [CHROMAgar Candida with fluconazole: comparison with microdilution techniques].
Linares MJ; Charriel G; Solís F; Casal M
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2003 Nov; 21(9):493-7. PubMed ID: 14572382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [In vitro antifungal susceptibility of dematiaceous filamentous fungi using the E-test].
Vivas JR; Torres-Rodríguez JM
Rev Esp Quimioter; 2001 Jun; 14(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 11704774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey of amphotericin B susceptibility of Candida clinical isolates determined by Etest.
Chiu YS; Chang SC; Hsueh PR; Wang JL; Sun HY; Chen YC
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2006 Aug; 39(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 16926981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Short communication: In vitro activity of amphotericin B with fluconazole or voriconazole combinations against Candida albicans isolates].
Oz Y; Akşit F; Kiraz N; Kiremitçi A
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2008 Jan; 42(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 18444574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Studies on microtiter broth dilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates from blood and cerebrospinal fluid].
Fujita S
Rinsho Byori; 1996 Apr; 44(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 8847821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between CLSI, EUCAST and Etest methodologies for amphotericin B and fluconazole antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. clinical isolates.
Claudino AL; Peixoto RF; Melhem MS; Szeszs MW; Lyon JP; Chavasco JK; Franco MC
Pharmazie; 2008 Apr; 63(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 18468388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of a dried commercially prepared microdilution panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of five antifungal agents against Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans.
Pfaller MA; Boyken L; Hollis RJ; Messer SA; Tendolkar S; Diekema DJ
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Oct; 50(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 15474320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study of the susceptibility of yeast isolates of clinical interest to five antifungal agents using the E test.
Linares MJ; Muñoz JF; Solís F; Rodríguez FC; Valero A; Casal M
Rev Esp Quimioter; 1998 Mar; 11(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 9795292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biofilm production and antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida species].
Yücesoy M; Karaman M
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004; 38(1-2):91-8. PubMed ID: 15293907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antifungal susceptibilities of Cryptococcus neoformans cerebrospinal fluid isolates and clinical outcomes of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected patients with/without fluconazole prophylaxis.
Manosuthi W; Sungkanuparph S; Thongyen S; Chumpathat N; Eampokalap B; Thawornwan U; Foongladda S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):795-802. PubMed ID: 16850679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing in vitro resistance to fluconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans Cambodian isolates: April 2000 to March 2002.
Sar B; Monchy D; Vann M; Keo C; Sarthou JL; Buisson Y
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Aug; 54(2):563-5. PubMed ID: 15254027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fluconazole vs amphotericin B: "in vitro" comparative evaluation of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) against yeasts isolated from AIDS patients.
Lombardi G; Gramegna G; Cavanna C; Michelone G
Microbiologica; 1990 Jul; 13(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 2273982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Susceptibilities to amphotericin B and fluconazole of Candida species in TSARY 2002.
Yang YL; Li SY; Cheng HH; Lo HJ;
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2005 Mar; 51(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 15766603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Etest and microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to four antifungal agents.
Aller AI; Martín-Mazuelos E; Gutiérrez MJ; Bernal S; Chávez M; Recio FJ
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2000 Dec; 46(6):997-1000. PubMed ID: 11102421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Etest method for determining fluconazole susceptibilities of 402 clinical yeast isolates by using three different agar media.
Pfaller MA; Messer SA; Karlsson A; Bolmström A
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Sep; 36(9):2586-9. PubMed ID: 9705397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro susceptibilities to yeasts using the ATB FUNGUS 2 method, compared with Sensititre Yeast One and standard CLSI (NCCLS) M27-A2 methods.
Torres-Rodríguez JM; Alvarado-Ramírez E
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Sep; 60(3):658-61. PubMed ID: 17623690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of different susceptibility testing methods and media on determination of the relevant fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations for heavy trailing Candida isolates with low-high phenotype.
Alp S; Sancak B; Hascelik G; Arikan S
Mycoses; 2010 Nov; 53(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 19563491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
