These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12790315)

  • 1. A likelihood ratio approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.
    Stengel D; Bauwens K; Sehouli J; Ekkernkamp A; Porzsolt F
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 12790315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Guolo A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews.
    Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 17611957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity values can be back-calculated when the odds ratios are known.
    Simel DL; Easter J; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 23021858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease: a comparative meta-analysis.
    Mahajan N; Polavaram L; Vankayala H; Ference B; Wang Y; Ager J; Kovach J; Afonso L
    Heart; 2010 Jun; 96(12):956-66. PubMed ID: 20538671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity: summary of quantitative findings in 50 meta-analyses.
    Menke J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 24828853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of diagnostic significance of sixty-four-row multi-section computed tomography angiography and three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography in patients with cerebral artery aneurysm.
    Guo W; He XY; Li XF; Qian DX; Yan JQ; Bu DL; Duan CZ
    J Neurol Sci; 2014 Nov; 346(1-2):197-203. PubMed ID: 25194636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Rasch analyses probability estimates to sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios when examining the utility of medical diagnostic tests.
    Cipriani D; Fox C; Khuder S; Boudreau N
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(2):180-201. PubMed ID: 15795486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
    Rubinstein ML; Kraft CS; Parrott JS
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2018 Nov; 5(4):205-214. PubMed ID: 30243015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of non-contrast balanced steady-state free precession megnetic resonance angiography compared to contrast-enhanced megnetic resonance angiography in diagnosing renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis.
    Tao W; Shen Y; Guo L; Bo G
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(19):3483-90. PubMed ID: 25269918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The predictive power of serum kappa/lambda ratios for discrimination between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma.
    Bergón E; Miravalles E; Bergón E; Miranda I; Bergón M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 15653439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies.
    Simel DL; Samsa GP; Matchar DB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(8):763-70. PubMed ID: 1941027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood ratios: a real improvement for clinical decision making?
    Dujardin B; Van den Ende J; Van Gompel A; Unger JP; Van der Stuyft P
    Eur J Epidemiol; 1994 Feb; 10(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7957786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random-effects meta-analysis of the clinical utility of tests and prediction models.
    Wynants L; Riley RD; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):2034-2052. PubMed ID: 29575170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews.
    Chen Y; Liu Y; Ning J; Nie L; Zhu H; Chu H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):914-930. PubMed ID: 25512146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of stratum-specific likelihood ratios in mental health screening.
    Schmitz N; Kruse J; Tress W
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2000 Aug; 35(8):375-9. PubMed ID: 11037307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compbdt: an R program to compare two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design.
    Roldán-Nofuentes JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):143. PubMed ID: 32503431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.