These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12792341)

  • 1. A modified VSP screw: two-year experience.
    Johnson RG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Jun; 16(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 12792341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Locking design affects the jamming of screws in locking plates.
    Sandriesser S; Rupp M; Greinwald M; Heiss C; Augat P; Alt V
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S61-S65. PubMed ID: 29929696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. C2 pedicle screw and plate combined with C1 titanium cable fixation for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability not suitable for placement of C1 screw.
    Xiao ZM; Zhan XL; Gong DF; Chen QF; Luo GB; Jiang H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):514-7. PubMed ID: 18836364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of screw insertion torque and pullout strength.
    Ricci WM; Tornetta P; Petteys T; Gerlach D; Cartner J; Walker Z; Russell TA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20502221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biomechanical comparison of two patterns of screw insertion.
    Lichtblau S; Gallina J; Nasser P; Munyoki M; Jepsen K
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 19093901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The biomechanical effect of artificial and human bone density on stopping and stripping torque during screw insertion.
    Tsuji M; Crookshank M; Olsen M; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Jun; 22():146-56. PubMed ID: 23578764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of the surgical torque limiter: a model comparing drill- and hand-based screw insertion into locking plates.
    Ioannou C; Knight M; Daniele L; Flueckiger L; Tan ES
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 11(1):118. PubMed ID: 27751170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronoid fractures.
    Moon JG; Zobitz ME; An KN; O'Driscoll SW
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Apr; 23(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 19318871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
    Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A biomechanical comparison of headless tapered variable pitch and AO cortical bone screws for fixation of a simulated lateral condylar fracture in equine third metacarpal bones.
    Galuppo LD; Stover SM; Jensen DG; Willits NH
    Vet Surg; 2001; 30(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 11443594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of a novel multilevel hex-head pedicle screw design with a conventional head design.
    Liu Q; Olson DR; Tiley FW; Shea M; Smits M; Hart RA
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Aug; 25(8):1115-20. PubMed ID: 17444509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of surgical errors on small fragment screw fixation.
    Collinge C; Hartigan B; Lautenschlager EP
    J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Jul; 20(6):410-3. PubMed ID: 16825967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Internal fixation of radial shaft fractures: Anatomical and biomechanical principles].
    Bartoníček J; Naňka O; Tuček M
    Rozhl Chir; 2015 Oct; 94(10):425-36. PubMed ID: 26556020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
    Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical difficulties in hardware removal in titanium compression plates with locking screws.
    Ehlinger M; Adam P; Simon P; Bonnomet F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Sep; 95(5):373-6. PubMed ID: 19648072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of sagittal insertion angle on intrapedicular bending moments.
    Youssef JA; McKinley TO; Yerby SA; McLain RF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(11):1077-81. PubMed ID: 10361656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs.
    McLain RF; Fry MF; Moseley TA; Sharkey NA
    J Spinal Disord; 1995 Feb; 8(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 7711371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone.
    Kwok AW; Finkelstein JA; Woodside T; Hearn TC; Hu RW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Nov; 21(21):2429-34. PubMed ID: 8923627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of screw insertion torque on push-out and cantilever bending properties of five different angle-stable systems.
    Boero Baroncelli A; Reif U; Bignardi C; Peirone B
    Vet Surg; 2013 Apr; 42(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 23373545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical testing of a new design for Schanz pedicle screws.
    Willett K; Hearn TC; Cuncins AV
    J Orthop Trauma; 1993; 7(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 8377050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.