770 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12793113)
1. Laboratory tests for diagnosis of food allergy: advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives.
Moneret-Vautrin DA; Kanny G; Frémont S
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2003 Apr; 35(4):113-9. PubMed ID: 12793113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of antifood IgE by in vitro tests and diagnosis of food allergy.
Moneret-Vautrin DA; Kanny G; Halpern G
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1993 May; 25(5):198-204. PubMed ID: 8318147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Food allergy diagnosis].
Moneret-Vautrin DA
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 2002 Sep; 34(7):241-4. PubMed ID: 12389446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of two multitests fx5 and fx10 in the diagnosis of food allergy in children: regarding 42 cases.
Moneret-Vautrin DA; Frémont S; Kanny G; Déjardin G; Hatahet R; Nicolas JP
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1995 Jan; 27(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 7702736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic value of glass microfibre-based basophil histamine release test in food allergic children. Comparison with specific IgE antibody and skin scratch test].
Iwasaki E; Yamaura M; Masuda K; Miyabayashi Y; Yamaguchi K; Zaitsu M; Fujimaki K; Baba M
Arerugi; 1994 May; 43(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 7518228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atopy patch test in the diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic eczema dermatitis syndrome.
Cudowska B; Kaczmarski M
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 2005; 50():261-7. PubMed ID: 16358980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. IgE-mediated food allergy diagnosis: Current status and new perspectives.
Asero R; Ballmer-Weber BK; Beyer K; Conti A; Dubakiene R; Fernandez-Rivas M; Hoffmann-Sommergruber K; Lidholm J; Mustakov T; Oude Elberink JN; Pumphrey RS; Stahl Skov P; van Ree R; Vlieg-Boerstra BJ; Hiller R; Hourihane JO; Kowalski M; Papadopoulos NG; Wal JM; Mills EN; Vieths S
Mol Nutr Food Res; 2007 Jan; 51(1):135-47. PubMed ID: 17195271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The predictive value of specific immunoglobulin E levels in serum for the outcome of oral food challenges.
Celik-Bilgili S; Mehl A; Verstege A; Staden U; Nocon M; Beyer K; Niggemann B
Clin Exp Allergy; 2005 Mar; 35(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 15784102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical update on peanut allergy.
Sicherer SH
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2002 Apr; 88(4):350-61; quiz 361-2, 394. PubMed ID: 11991552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive value of skin prick tests using recombinant allergens for diagnosis of peanut allergy.
Astier C; Morisset M; Roitel O; Codreanu F; Jacquenet S; Franck P; Ogier V; Petit N; Proust B; Moneret-Vautrin DA; Burks AW; Bihain B; Sampson HA; Kanny G
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2006 Jul; 118(1):250-6. PubMed ID: 16815163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delayed- and immediate-type reactions in the atopy patch test with food allergens in young children with atopic dermatitis.
Devillers AC; de Waard-van der Spek FB; Mulder PG; Oranje AP
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2009 Feb; 20(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 18627510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Multitest Fx5 in food allergy].
Sabbah A; Solier C; Lauret MG; Drouet M
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1992 Sep; 24(7):253-5. PubMed ID: 1388658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship of allergen-specific IgE levels and oral food challenge outcome.
Perry TT; Matsui EC; Kay Conover-Walker M; Wood RA
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Jul; 114(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 15241358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical, anamnestic and serological features of peach allergy in portugal.
Rodrigues-Alves R; Lopez A; Pereira-Santos MC; Lopes-Silva S; Spínola-Santos A; Costa C; Branco-Ferreira M; Lidholm J; Pereira-Barbosa M
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2009; 149(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 19033734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical usefulness of histamine release test in determining allergens in food hypersensitivity].
Mita H; Tadokoro K; Mishima T; Shida T
Arerugi; 1993 Aug; 42(8):900-6. PubMed ID: 7504445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A novel diagnostic method for allergy "LUCICA HRT"].
Yamakoshi M; Fujii Y; Nagai H; Ohyama K
Rinsho Byori; 1997 Feb; 45(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 9121001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A critical assessment of allergen component-based in vitro diagnosis in cherry allergy across Europe.
Reuter A; Lidholm J; Andersson K; Ostling J; Lundberg M; Scheurer S; Enrique E; Cistero-Bahima A; San Miguel-Moncin M; Ballmer-Weber BK; Vieths S
Clin Exp Allergy; 2006 Jun; 36(6):815-23. PubMed ID: 16776683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can conjunctival provocation test facilitate the diagnosis of food allergy in children?
Krane Kvenshagen B; Jacobsen M; Halvorsen R
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2010; 38(6):321-6. PubMed ID: 20605314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relevance of Ara h1, Ara h2 and Ara h3 in peanut-allergic patients, as determined by immunoglobulin E Western blotting, basophil-histamine release and intracutaneous testing: Ara h2 is the most important peanut allergen.
Koppelman SJ; Wensing M; Ertmann M; Knulst AC; Knol EF
Clin Exp Allergy; 2004 Apr; 34(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 15080811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical significance of food specific IgE/IgG4 in food specific atopic dermatitis.
Noh G; Ahn HS; Cho NY; Lee S; Oh JW
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2007 Feb; 18(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 17295801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
