143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12793731)
1. Modeling the response of thermoluminescence detectors exposed to low- and high-LET radiation fields.
Olko P; Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Waligórski MP; Reitz G
J Radiat Res; 2002 Dec; 43 Suppl():S59-62. PubMed ID: 12793731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetry of heavy charged particles with thermoluminescence detectors--models and applications.
Olko P; Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Molokanov A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):315-8. PubMed ID: 15353666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microdosimetric modelling of the response of thermoluminescence detectors to low- and high-LET ionising radiation.
Olko P; Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Czopyk L; Swakon J; Waligorski MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):378-81. PubMed ID: 17261540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors.
Olko P; Bilski P; El-Faramawy NA; Göksu HY; Kim JL; Kopec R; Waligórski MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):15-22. PubMed ID: 16644968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LiF:Mg,Ti (MTT) TL detectors optimised for high-LET radiation dosimetry.
Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Olko P; Mandowska E
Radiat Meas; 2004; 38(4-6):427-30. PubMed ID: 15856580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alpha particle and proton relative thermoluminescence efficiencies in LiF:Mg,Cu,P:is track structure theory up to the task?
Horowitz YS; Siboni D; Oster L; Livingstone J; Guatelli S; Rosenfeld A; Emfietzoglou D; Bilski P; Obryk B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):359-74. PubMed ID: 22042968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL efficiency for X-rays and their application to Monte Carlo simulations of dosemeter response.
Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):483-6. PubMed ID: 16822775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Response of lithium fluoride detector to charged particle LET].
Wang GL; Qi ZN; Chen M; Huang ZX; Xu ZH
Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2001 Apr; 14(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 11808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MICRODOSIMETRIC MODELING OF THE RELATIVE LUMINESCENCE EFFICIENCY OF LiF:Mg,Cu,P (MCP) DETECTORS EXPOSED TO CHARGED PARTICLES.
Parisi A; Van Hoey O; Mégret P; Vanhavere F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 May; 183(1-2):172-176. PubMed ID: 30561684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the radiation-induced cell death in a therapeutic proton beam using thermoluminescent detectors and radiation transport simulations.
Parisi A; Olko P; Swakoń J; Horwacik T; Jabłoński H; Malinowski L; Nowak T; Struelens L; Vanhavere F
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(1):015008. PubMed ID: 31569080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microdosimetric interpretation of the photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti detectors.
Olko P; Bilski P; Kim JL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):119-22. PubMed ID: 12382842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Measurements of proton response of two lithium fluoride detectors with different thicknesses].
Wang GL; Qi ZN; Chen M; Huang ZX; Li XG
Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2000 Apr; 13(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 11543053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MICRODOSIMETRIC MODELING OF THE RELATIVE LUMINESCENCE EFFICIENCY OF LiF:Mg,Ti (MTS) DETECTORS EXPOSED TO CHARGED PARTICLES.
Parisi A; Van Hoey O; Vanhavere F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Aug; 180(1-4):192-195. PubMed ID: 29036395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the relative TL efficiency of the thermoluminescent detectors to heavy charged particles.
Sądel M; Bilski P; Swakoń J; Weber A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25656042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative TL and OSL efficiency to protons of various dosimetric materials.
Sądel M; Bilski P; Swakoń J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):112-5. PubMed ID: 24036656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy response of different types of RADOS personal dosemeters with MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) and MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) TL detectors.
Obryk B; Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Budzanowski M; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):211-4. PubMed ID: 21227957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency-corrected dose verification with thermoluminescence dosemeters in heavy-ion beams.
Berger T; Hajek M; Fugger M; Vana N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):361-4. PubMed ID: 16709709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response of thermoluminescent detectors to charged particles and to neutrons.
Spurný F
Radiat Meas; 2004; 38(4-6):407-12. PubMed ID: 15856571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of ionisation density on the thermoluminescence response (efficiency) of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
Horowitz Y; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):331-48. PubMed ID: 15273352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
