96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12794409)
1. Opinions about surrogate designation: a population survey in France.
Azoulay E; Pochard F; Chevret S; Adrie C; Bollaert PE; Brun F; Dreyfuss D; Garrouste-Orgeas M; Goldgran-Toledano D; Jourdain M; Wolff M; Le Gall JR; Schlemmer B
Crit Care Med; 2003 Jun; 31(6):1711-4. PubMed ID: 12794409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical information and surrogate designation: results of a prospective study in elderly hospitalised patients.
Paillaud E; Ferrand E; Lejonc JL; Henry O; Bouillanne O; Montagne O
Age Ageing; 2007 May; 36(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 17261528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-related factors and circumstances surrounding decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment, including intensive care unit admission refusal.
Reignier J; Dumont R; Katsahian S; Martin-Lefevre L; Renard B; Fiancette M; Lebert C; Clementi E; Bontemps F
Crit Care Med; 2008 Jul; 36(7):2076-83. PubMed ID: 18552685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surrogate decision makers for incompetent ICU patients: a European perspective.
Lautrette A; Peigne V; Watts J; Souweine B; Azoulay E
Curr Opin Crit Care; 2008 Dec; 14(6):714-9. PubMed ID: 19005315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attitudes and preferences of intensivists regarding the role of family interests in medical decision making for incompetent patients.
Hardart GE; Truog RD
Crit Care Med; 2003 Jul; 31(7):1895-900. PubMed ID: 12847380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Admission of incompetent patients to intensive care: doctors' responsiveness to family wishes.
Escher M; Perneger TV; Heidegger CP; Chevrolet JC
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):528-32. PubMed ID: 19114900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do clinical and formal assessments of the capacity of patients in the intensive care unit to make decisions agree?
Cohen LM; McCue JD; Green GM
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Nov; 153(21):2481-5. PubMed ID: 8215753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensive care unit survey.
Nelson JE; Angus DC; Weissfeld LA; Puntillo KA; Danis M; Deal D; Levy MM; Cook DJ;
Crit Care Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):2547-53. PubMed ID: 16932230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Autonomy, informed consent and advance directives: a study of physician attitudes.
Sypher B; Hall RT; Rosencrance G
W V Med J; 2005; 101(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 16161532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes of relatives of patients in intensive care and emergency departments to surrogate consent to research on incapacitated participants.
Stephenson AC; Baker S; Zeps N
Crit Care Resusc; 2007 Mar; 9(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 17352666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The process used by surrogate decision makers to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining measures in an intensive care environment.
Limerick MH
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2007 Mar; 34(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 17573297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. End-of-life captivity of advance directives in the United States: challenges from a French study.
Burck R
Crit Care Med; 2003 Jun; 31(6):1872-3. PubMed ID: 12794439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Decision-making capacity and surrogate designation in French ICU patients.
Ferrand E; Bachoud-Levi AC; Rodrigues M; Maggiore S; Brun-Buisson C; Lemaire F
Intensive Care Med; 2001 Aug; 27(8):1360-4. PubMed ID: 11511949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective study of primary surrogate decision makers' knowledge of intensive care.
Rodriguez RM; Navarrete E; Schwaber J; McKleroy W; Clouse A; Kerrigan SF; Fortman J
Crit Care Med; 2008 May; 36(5):1633-6. PubMed ID: 18434916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Key ethic discussions in hospice/palliative care].
Jusić A
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Dec; 62(5):447-54. PubMed ID: 19382626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Autonomy and dementia Part II: autonomy and representation: a possible combination?].
Rigaux N
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil; 2011 Jun; 9(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 21690029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitudes of physicians, nurses and relatives towards end-of-life decisions concerning nursing home patients with dementia.
Rurup ML; Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD; Pasman HR; Ribbe MW; van der Wal G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 15975757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Written information that relatives of adult intensive care unit patients would like to receive--a comparison to published recommendations and opinion of staff members.
Soltner C; Lassalle V; Galienne-Bouygues S; Pottecher J; Floccard B; Delapierre L; Jungfer F; Sargentini C; Alberti C; Beydon L;
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7):2197-202. PubMed ID: 19487940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of perception of socioeconomic burden on advocacy for patient autonomy in end-of-life decision making: a study of societal attitudes.
Kwon YC; Shin DW; Lee JH; Heo DS; Hong YS; Kim SY; Yun YH
Palliat Med; 2009 Jan; 23(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 18996980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
