153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12794592)
1. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in benign and malignant biliary stenosis: comparative study with direct cholangiography.
Courbière M; Pilleul F; Henry L; Ponchon T; Touzet S; Valette PJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 12794592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary obstruction.
Magnuson TH; Bender JS; Duncan MD; Ahrendt SA; Harmon JW; Regan F
J Am Coll Surg; 1999 Jul; 189(1):63-71; discussion 71-2. PubMed ID: 10401742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Malignant biliary hilar stenosis: MR cholangiography compared with direct cholangiography].
Manfredi R; Brizi MG; Masselli G; Vecchioli A; Marano P
Radiol Med; 2001; 102(1-2):48-54. PubMed ID: 11677438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Angulo P; Pearce DH; Johnson CD; Henry JJ; LaRusso NF; Petersen BT; Lindor KD
J Hepatol; 2000 Oct; 33(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 11059855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases.
Mendler MH; Bouillet P; Sautereau D; Chaumerliac P; Cessot F; Le Sidaner A; Pillegand B
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Dec; 93(12):2482-90. PubMed ID: 9860413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Soto JA; Barish MA; Yucel EK; Siegenberg D; Ferrucci JT; Chuttani R
Gastroenterology; 1996 Feb; 110(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 8566608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance cholangiography features of biliary abnormalities due to cavernous transformation of the portal vein.
Chevallier P; Denys A; Novellas S; Schmidt S; Schnyder P; Bruneton JN
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 16632155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method.
Zidi SH; Prat F; Le Guen O; Rondeau Y; Rocher L; Fritsch J; Choury AD; Pelletier G
Gut; 1999 Jan; 44(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 9862837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
Vogl TJ; Schwarz WO; Heller M; Herzog C; Zangos S; Hintze RE; Neuhaus P; Hammerstingl RM
Eur Radiol; 2006 Oct; 16(10):2317-25. PubMed ID: 16622690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation with MR cholangiography.
Fulcher AS; Turner MA
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 10352596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: The role of MR imaging using different hydrographic sequences in patients with biliary-enteric and duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis.
Stadnik A; Cieszanowski A; Maj E; Cieślak B; Anysz-Grodzicka A; Zieniewicz K; Krawczyk M; Rowiński O
Ann Transplant; 2013 Sep; 18():460-70. PubMed ID: 24022113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR cholangiography in biliary obstruction using half-Fourier acquisition.
Regan F; Smith D; Khazan R; Bohlman M; Schultze-Haakh H; Campion J; Magnuson TH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 8708069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical value of MRC in the follow-up of liver transplant patients with a choledochojejunostomy.
Ott R; Greess H; Aichinger U; Fellner F; Herold C; Yedibela S; Bussenius-Kammerer M; Müller V; Hohenberger W; Reck T
Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 12173367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biliary ductal involvement of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: multidetector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography.
Cho ES; Park MS; Yu JS; Kim MJ; Kim KW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17259836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures.
Zidi SH; Prat F; Le Guen O; Rondeau Y; Pelletier G
Gut; 2000 Jan; 46(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 10601064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the evaluation of late biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.
Beltrán MM; Marugán RB; Oton E; Blesa C; Nuño J
Transplant Proc; 2005 Nov; 37(9):3924-5. PubMed ID: 16386586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in biliary complications of orthotopic liver transplantation.
Pecchi A; De Santis M; Di Benedetto F; Gibertini M; Gerunda G; Torricelli P
Radiol Med; 2010 Oct; 115(7):1065-79. PubMed ID: 20680501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in adult live liver donors with volumetric mangafodipir trisodium enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography.
Ayuso JR; Ayuso C; Bombuy E; De Juan C; Llovet JM; De Caralt TM; Sánchez M; Pagés M; Bruix J; García-Valdecasas JC
Liver Transpl; 2004 Nov; 10(11):1391-7. PubMed ID: 15497156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic imaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: preoperative evaluation of ERC, MRC and PTC in comparison with histopathology].
Romaneehsen B; Otto G; Lohse AW; Bittinger F; Herber S; Oberholzer K; Pitton MB; Thelen M
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1750-8. PubMed ID: 15573285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid as an intrabiliary contrast agent: preliminary assessment.
Carlos RC; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 12076911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
