113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1279622)
1. Programmed electrical stimulation protocols: variations on a theme.
Fisher JD; Kim SG; Ferrick KJ; Roth J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2180-7. PubMed ID: 1279622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulation hierarchy: optimal sequence for double and triple extrastimuli during electrophysiological studies.
Artoul SG; Fisher JD; Kim SG; Ferrick KJ; Roth JA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 May; 15(5):790-800. PubMed ID: 1382282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Programmed electrical stimulation of the ventricle: an efficient, sensitive, and specific protocol.
Fisher JD; Kim SG; Ferrick KJ; Artoul SG; Fink D; Roth JA; Johnston DR; Williams HR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Apr; 15(4 Pt 1):435-50. PubMed ID: 1374888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in ventricular effective refractory periods after two extrastimuli and ventricular electrical instability.
Bytesník J; Lefflerová K; Bicík V; Cihák R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2174-9. PubMed ID: 1279621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective comparison of a conventional and an accelerated protocol for programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease.
Morady F; Kadish A; de Buitleir M; Kou WH; Calkins H; Schmaltz S; Rosenheck S; Sousa J
Circulation; 1991 Mar; 83(3):764-73. PubMed ID: 1999027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Programmed ventricular stimulation using up to two extrastimuli and repetition of double extrastimulation for induction of ventricular tachycardia: a new highly sensitive and specific protocol.
Belhassen B; Shapira I; Sheps D; Laniado S
Am J Cardiol; 1990 Mar; 65(9):615-22. PubMed ID: 2309631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective comparison of programmed ventricular stimulation with triple extrastimuli versus single and double extrastimuli during infusion of isoproterenol.
Baerman JM; Morady F; de Buitleir M; DiCarlo LA; Kou WH; Nelson SD
Am Heart J; 1989 Feb; 117(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 2644794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison in the same patient of two programmed ventricular stimulation protocols to induce ventricular tachycardia.
Brugada P; Wellens HJ
Am J Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 55(4):380-3. PubMed ID: 3969873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective comparison of triple extrastimuli and left ventricular stimulation in studies of ventricular tachycardia induction.
Morady F; DiCarlo L; Winston S; Davis JC; Scheinman MM
Circulation; 1984 Jul; 70(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 6723011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of programmed electrical stimulation responses in patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation associated with coronary artery disease.
Volgman AS; Zheutlin TA; Mattioni TA; Parker MA; Kehoe RF
Am J Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 70(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 1519526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation with four extrastimuli compared with one, two, and three extrastimuli.
Hummel JD; Strickberger SA; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Bakr O; Man KC; Williamson BD; Morady F
Circulation; 1994 Dec; 90(6):2827-32. PubMed ID: 7994827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limited value of programmed electrical stimulation from multiple right ventricular pacing sites in clinically sustained ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease.
Kudenchuk PJ; Kron J; Walance C; McAnulty JH
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 3341206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiologic and anatomic characteristics of ventricular tachycardia induced at the right ventricular outflow tract but not at the apex.
Klein LS; Armstrong WF; Miles WM; Heger JJ; Zipes DP; Prystowsky EN
Am Heart J; 1991 Aug; 122(2):464-8. PubMed ID: 1858627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the results of programmed ventricular stimulation from the right ventricular apex and outflow tract: a randomized, prospective study.
Martínez-Rubio A; Stachowitz A; Borggrefe M; Reinhardt L; Cabrera-Santos A; Chen X; Willems S; Shenasa M; Breithardt G
Eur Heart J; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1234-43. PubMed ID: 8582387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of number of extrastimuli versus change in basic cycle length for induction of ventricular tachycardia by programmed ventricular stimulation.
Ho DS; Cooper MJ; Richards DA; Uther JB; Yip AS; Ross DL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Nov; 22(6):1711-7. PubMed ID: 8227844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of drive cycle length during programmed stimulation on induction of ventricular arrhythmias: analysis of 403 patients.
Estes NA; Garan H; McGovern B; Ruskin JN
Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jan; 57(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 3942052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of benefit of very short basic drive train cycle length or repetition of extrastimulus coupling intervals for induction of ventricular tachycardia.
Lee CS; Wan SH; Cooper MJ; Ross DL
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Jun; 9(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 9654221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of ventricular arrhythmias induced with programmed stimulation versus alternating current.
Cua M; Veltri EP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Mar; 16(3 Pt 1):382-6. PubMed ID: 7681187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of extrastimulus prematurity and intraventricular conduction time in inducing ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation secondary to coronary artery disease.
Gillis AM; Winkle RA; Echt DS
Am J Cardiol; 1987 Sep; 60(7):590-5. PubMed ID: 3630942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of ventricular fibrillation versus monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during programmed stimulation. Role of premature beat conduction delay.
Avitall B; McKinnie J; Jazayeri M; Akhtar M; Anderson AJ; Tchou P
Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1271-8. PubMed ID: 1372847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
