These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12797074)

  • 41. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD.
    Hadlock FP; Deter RL; Carpenter RJ; Park SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Jul; 137(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 6787895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Occipito-posterior fetal head position, maternal and neonatal outcome].
    Martino V; Iliceto N; Simeoni U
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 17923836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
    Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Automatic evaluation of fetal head biometry from ultrasound images using machine learning.
    Kim HP; Lee SM; Kwon JY; Park Y; Kim KC; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Jul; 40(6):065009. PubMed ID: 31091515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Biparietal diameter and femur length discrepancies: are maternal characteristics important?
    Jones TB; Wolfe HM; Zador IE
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):405-9. PubMed ID: 12797023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Automatic image quality assessment and measurement of fetal head in two-dimensional ultrasound image.
    Zhang L; Dudley NJ; Lambrou T; Allinson N; Ye X
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Apr; 4(2):024001. PubMed ID: 28439522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Automatic segmentation of ultrasound images using morphological operators.
    Thomas JG; Peters RA; Jeanty P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1991; 10(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 18222815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Interactive automatic fetal head measurements from ultrasound images using multimedia computer technology.
    Pathak SD; Chalana V; Kim Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 9253814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ultrasound measurement of fetal growth in Macaca nemestrina.
    Conrad S; Ha J; Lohr C; Sackett G
    Am J Primatol; 1995; 36(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 31924085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Normal fetal head growth curve, by sequential measurement of the biparietal diameter by ultrasonography].
    Zamora Orozco J; Cortés Gallo G; Hernández MJ; Shor Pinsker V; Karchmer S
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1981 Mar; 49(293):139-51. PubMed ID: 7319254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison between linear array real time ultrasonic scanning and conventional compound scanning in the measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter.
    Docker MF; Settatree RS
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1977 Dec; 84(12):924-9. PubMed ID: 588504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Differentiating Operator Skill during Routine Fetal Ultrasound Scanning using Probe Motion Tracking.
    Wang Y; Droste R; Jiao J; Sharma H; Drukker L; Papageorghiou AT; Noble JA
    Med Ultrasound Preterm Perinat Paediatr Image Anal (2020); 2020 Oct; 12437():180-188. PubMed ID: 33103166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A clinical assessment of real time ultrasound.
    Ritchie WA; Thompson W
    Ir J Med Sci; 1979 Dec; 148(1):251. PubMed ID: 27517431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Eye pupil diameter measurement and assessment via a novel pupilometer system.
    Tsalpatouros A; Panou-Diamandi O; Papageorgiou C; Rambavillas A; Stefanis C; Uzunoglu N; Koutsouris D
    Technol Health Care; 1994 Jan; 2(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 25274084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of the process characteristics on the role of the human operator in process control.
    Edwards E; Lees FP
    Appl Ergon; 1974 Mar; 5(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 15677140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A computer program for the localization of small areas in roentgenological images.
    Keller RA; Baily NA
    Invest Radiol; 1976; 11(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 770390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [A measurement and computing complex for control of the state of the operator].
    Akhutin VM; Ermilov NN; Larionov LV; Monakhova AI; Neroslavskiĭ IA
    Med Tekh; 1989; (3):8-12. PubMed ID: 2770504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of two methods of obtaining biparietal and bigonial measurements.
    POTTER JW; MEREDITH HV
    J Dent Res; 1948 Aug; 27(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 18875174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Observations upon the Nature and Treatment of Difficult Occipito-Posterior Positions of the Head, Founded upon an Analysis of Twenty-Six Operative Cases.
    Macdonald A
    Edinb Med J; 1874 Oct; 20(4):302-316. PubMed ID: 29638897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Observations upon the Nature and Treatment of Difficult Occipito-Posterior Positions of the Head, Founded upon an Analysis of Twenty-Six Operative Cases.
    MacDonald A
    Trans Edinb Obstet Soc; 1875; 3():356-378. PubMed ID: 29613575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.