80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12797083)
1. Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian Multicentric Study.
Levi S; Hyjazi Y; Schaapst JP; Defoort P; Coulon R; Buekens P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Mar; 1(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 12797083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. End-result of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: the Belgian Multicentric Study 1984-92.
Levi S; Schaaps JP; De Havay P; Coulon R; Defoort P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 5(6):366-71. PubMed ID: 7552796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting fetal anomalies and perinatal outcome of anomalous fetuses.
Lee K; Kim SY; Choi SM; Kim JS; Lee BS; Seo K; Lee YH; Kim DK
Yonsei Med J; 1998 Aug; 39(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 9752805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Routine ultrasound screening and detection of congenital anomalies outside a university setting.
Nakling J; Backe B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 16232170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Normal obstetric ultrasound reduces the risk of Down syndrome in fetuses of older mothers.
Anderson NG; Luehr B; Ng R
Australas Radiol; 2006 Oct; 50(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 16981938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced first trimester screening (AFS): an improved test strategy for the individual risk assessment of fetal aneuploidies and malformations.
Schmidt P; Rom J; Maul H; Vaske B; Hillemanns P; Scharf A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 17342500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How important is a cardiac echogenic focus in a routine fetal examination?
Carriço A; Matias A; Areias JC
Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 23(3):459-61. PubMed ID: 15185567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of malformations of the fetal central nervous system using fetal MRI].
Blondin D; Schaper J; Klee D; Reihs T; Hammer R; Mödder U; Messing-Jünger M
Rofo; 2008 Aug; 180(8):715-21. PubMed ID: 18484515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal gender screening by ultrasound at 11 to 13(+6) weeks.
Hsiao CH; Wang HC; Hsieh CF; Hsu JJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 17851807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The utility of detailed first trimester ultrasound examination in abnormal fetal nuchal translucency.
Bronshtein M; Zimmer EZ; Blazer S
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Nov; 28(11):1037-41. PubMed ID: 18925580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal ultrasound findings in complete trisomy 9.
Sepulveda W; Wimalasundera RC; Taylor MJ; Blunt S; Be C; De La Fuente S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Nov; 22(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 14618660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lack of correlation between elevated maternal serum hCG during second-trimester biochemical screening and fetal congenital anomaly.
Celentano C; Guanciali-Franchi PE; Liberati M; Palka C; Fantasia D; Morizio E; Calabrese G; Stuppia L; Rotmensch S
Prenat Diagn; 2005 Mar; 25(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 15791663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.
Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of ultrasound screening options for structural fetal malformations.
Vanara F; Bergeretti F; Gaglioti P; Todros T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 15517556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of 2407 fetuses in a Turkish population.
Ceylaner G; Ceylaner S; Günyeli I; Ekici E; Celasun B; Danişman N
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):800-7. PubMed ID: 17582619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Routine ultrasound screening of congenital anomalies. An overview of the European experience.
Levi S
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():86-98. PubMed ID: 9668701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine prenatal ultrasound anomaly screening program in a Nigerian university hospital: Redefining obstetrics practice in a developing African country.
Akinmoladun JA; Ogbole GI; Lawal TA; Adesina OA
Niger Med J; 2015; 56(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 26759511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia.
Zile-Velika I; Ebela I; Folkmanis V; Rumba-Rozenfelde I
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Dec; 20():100242. PubMed ID: 37771958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ultrasound screening at 18-20 weeks.].
Geirsson RT
Laeknabladid; 2001 May; 87(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 17018977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
