These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12797167)

  • 1. The use of transvaginal ultrasonography compared to routine gynecological examination to check the location of an intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Granberg S; Bundsen P; Bourne TH; Almén M; Grenthe M; Leandersson R; Tönnberg C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 4(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 12797167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time ultrasound in locating intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Nelson LH; Miller JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Dec; 54(6):711-4. PubMed ID: 514557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Doppler study of the uterine artery in patients using an intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Momtaz M; Zayed M; Rashid K; Idriss O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 4(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 12797188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrauterine contraceptive device localization by clinical evaluation and real-time ultrasonography.
    Kivijärvi A; Piiroinen O
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Nov; 4(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 6394323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The use of three-dimensional ultrasound imaging in detecting the type and location of intrauterine contraceptive device].
    Zhang S; Ying W; Xu J; Yang M; Xu K; Luo Q
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Apr; 82(7):459-61. PubMed ID: 12133515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of intrauterine device and oral contraceptive on vaginal flora and epithelium.
    Ocak S; Cetin M; Hakverdi S; Dolapcioglu K; Gungoren A; Hakverdi AU
    Saudi Med J; 2007 May; 28(5):727-31. PubMed ID: 17457440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound-controlled removal of a dislocated intrauterine device in the first trimester of pregnancy: a report of 26 cases.
    Kirkinen P; Simojoki M; Kivelä A; Jouppila P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 2(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 12796934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound: an effective method for localization of the echogenic Essure sterilization micro-insert: correlation with radiologic evaluations.
    Kerin JF; Levy BS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15904599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval of missing IUCD threads.
    Husemeyer RP; Gordon H
    Br J Sex Med; 1980 Mar; 7(58):32-4, 51. PubMed ID: 12312645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method of transvaginal ultrasound-guided polypectomy: a feasibility study.
    Lee C; Ben-Nagi J; Ofili-Yebovi D; Yazbek J; Davies A; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 16381064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Actinomyces in cervical smears of women using the intrauterine device in Singapore.
    Kalaichelvan V; Maw AA; Singh K
    Contraception; 2006 Apr; 73(4):352-5. PubMed ID: 16531165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of a missing intrauterine contraceptive device after location through an ultrasound: a case report within a rural setting and review of literature.
    Argaw MD; Abawollo HS; Desta BF; Tsegaye ZT; Belete DM; Abebe MG
    Contracept Reprod Med; 2020 Dec; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 33292662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices.
    Johnson BA
    Am Fam Physician; 2005 Jan; 71(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 15663031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [An analysis of complications and bacteriological and histological studies following extraction of an intrauterine contraceptive device (Beospir) which was inserted several years ago].
    Kracunović M; Oprić M
    Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1980; 19(3-4):191-4. PubMed ID: 7412377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study.
    Letti Müller AL; Lopes Ramos JG; Martins-Costa SH; Palma Dias RS; Valério EG; Hammes LS; Glitz CL; Zucatto AE; Vettori DV; Magalhães JA
    Contraception; 2005 Sep; 72(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 16102554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic ultrasound in the management of patients using intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Wittmann BK; Chow TT
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1976 Oct; 83(10):802-8. PubMed ID: 990221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The case of asymptomatic primary actinomycosis of the greater omentum in the patient with intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Milojković M; Mrcela M; Rubin M; Pajtler M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Dec; 31(4):1169-71. PubMed ID: 18217476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prolonged use of intrauterine contraceptive device as a risk factor for tubo-ovarian abscess.
    Charonis G; Larsson PG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):680-4. PubMed ID: 19412803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonically controlled retrieval of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) in early pregnancy.
    Shalev E; Edelstein S; Engelhard J; Weiner E; Zuckerman H
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1987 Oct; 15(8):525-9. PubMed ID: 3134459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.