These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12797175)

  • 21. Ethical analysis of non-medical fetal ultrasound.
    Leung JL; Pang SM
    Nurs Ethics; 2009 Sep; 16(5):637-46. PubMed ID: 19671649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ethical challenges of treating the critically ill pregnant patient.
    van Bogaert LJ; Dhai A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):983-96. PubMed ID: 18693070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical implications of the ethics of informed consent for first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Chasen ST
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 16104682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do differences in the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists positions on the ethics of maternal-fetal interventions reflect subtly divergent professional sensitivities to pregnant women and fetuses?
    Brown SD; Truog RD; Johnson JA; Ecker JL
    Pediatrics; 2006 Apr; 117(4):1382-7. PubMed ID: 16585336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [A Norwegian consensus on ultrasound scanning. Do not screen pregnant women but provide them with information].
    Waldenström U
    Lakartidningen; 1995 May; 92(19):2017-8. PubMed ID: 7752744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness model for first-trimester versus second-trimester ultrasound screening for Down syndrome.
    Kott B; Dubinsky TJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jun; 1(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 17411619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Application of rehabilitation ethics to a selected burn patient population's perspective.
    Brewster LP; Bennett BK; Gamelli RL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):766-71. PubMed ID: 17084341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rights of and duties to non-consenting patients--informed refusal in the developing world.
    van Bogaert LJ
    Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Mar; 6(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 16436170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Handbook on medical ethics: medical ethics and the practitioner.
    Issues Med Ethics; 1996; 4(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 15011679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An introduction to informed consent: ethico-legal requirements.
    Dhai A
    SADJ; 2008 Feb; 63(1):018-20. PubMed ID: 18543735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The federal government and academic texts as barriers to informed consent.
    Lanfranchi A
    Issues Law Med; 2008; 24(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18771039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risky business: applying risk/benefit analysis consistently in entertainment ultrasound.
    De Crespigny L; Douglas T; Wilkinson D; Savulescu J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):613-5. PubMed ID: 19953570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Autonomy in medical ethics after O'Neill.
    Stirrat GM; Gill R
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Mar; 31(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 15738430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fetal anomaly screening: what do women want to know?
    Lalor J; Begley C
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 16768735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Routine UL-scanning?].
    Olsen O
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Sep; 159(37):5548. PubMed ID: 9312931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Patient autonomy].
    Ortega Moreno A
    Neurologia; 2004 Dec; 19 Suppl 4():30-6. PubMed ID: 15719287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Children and research participation: who makes what decisions.
    Simpson C
    Health Law Rev; 2003; 11(2):20-9. PubMed ID: 15706697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21.
    Nicolaides KH; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Avgidou K; Papageorghiou A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):322-6. PubMed ID: 16098850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 35(7):410-4. PubMed ID: 19567688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cultural variation in values attached to informed choice in the context of prenatal diagnosis.
    van den Heuvel A; Marteau TM
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Apr; 13(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 18255366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.