These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12797570)

  • 1. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Muangmingsuk A; Senawongse P; Yudhasaraprasithi S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of resin composite polymerization techniques on microleakage and microhardness.
    Amaral CM; de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Ambrosano GM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Oct; 33(9):685-9. PubMed ID: 12666894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H; Tahvildarnejad N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study.
    St Georges AJ; Wilder AD; Perdigão J; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 12572642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
    Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Francci CE; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites.
    Civelek A; Ersoy M; L'Hotelier E; Soyman M; Say EC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 14531612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
    Stritikus J; Owens B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.