200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12798538)
1. Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancy.
Stanford JB; Smith KR; Dunson DB
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1285-93. PubMed ID: 12798538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical mucus patterns and the fertile window in women without known subfertility: a pooled analysis of three cohorts.
Najmabadi S; Schliep KC; Simonsen SE; Porucznik CA; Egger MJ; Stanford JB
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 36(7):1784-1795. PubMed ID: 33990841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical mucus secretions on the day of intercourse: an accurate marker of highly fertile days.
Scarpa B; Dunson DB; Colombo B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Mar; 125(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 16154254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse.
Bigelow JL; Dunson DB; Stanford JB; Ecochard R; Gnoth C; Colombo B
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 14990542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of menstrual cycles with or without intercourse in women with no known subfertility.
Najmabadi S; Schliep KC; Simonsen SE; Porucznik CA; Egger MJ; Stanford JB
Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(4):hoac039. PubMed ID: 36186844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fertility awareness and natural family planning.
Pyper CM
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1997 Jun; 2(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 9678103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cumulative pregnancy rates in patients with apparently normal fertility and fertility-focused intercourse.
Hilgers TW; Daly KD; Prebil AM; Hilgers SK
J Reprod Med; 1992 Oct; 37(10):864-6. PubMed ID: 1479570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples.
Keulers MJ; Hamilton CJ; Franx A; Evers JL; Bots RS
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1652-6. PubMed ID: 17449509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian selection of optimal rules for timing intercourse to conceive by using calendar and mucus.
Scarpa B; Dunson DB; Giacchi E
Fertil Steril; 2007 Oct; 88(4):915-24. PubMed ID: 17601602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian selection of predictors of conception probabilities across the menstrual cycle.
Scarpa B; Dunson DB
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 20 Suppl 1():30-7. PubMed ID: 17061971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduced fertilization rates in older men when cervical mucus is suboptimal.
Dunson DB; Bigelow JL; Colombo B
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 15802406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of perception of ovulation day in women trying to conceive.
Zinaman M; Johnson S; Ellis J; Ledger W
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 May; 28(5):749-54. PubMed ID: 22462529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peri-implantation intercourse does not lower fecundability.
Stanford JB; Hansen JL; Willis SK; Hu N; Thomas A
Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2107-2112. PubMed ID: 32756956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of woman-picked, expert-picked, and computer-picked Peak Day of cervical mucus with blinded urine luteinising hormone surge for concurrent identification of ovulation.
Stanford JB; Schliep KC; Chang CP; O'Sullivan JP; Porucznik CA
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 34(2):105-113. PubMed ID: 32101336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between cervical secretions and the daily probabilities of pregnancy: effectiveness of the TwoDay Algorithm.
Dunson DB; Sinai I; Colombo B
Hum Reprod; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2278-82. PubMed ID: 11679504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Fertility Awareness-Based Methods' and subfertility: a systematic review.
Thijssen A; Meier A; Panis K; Ombelet W
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2014; 6(3):113-23. PubMed ID: 25374654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-identification of the clinical fertile window and the ovulation period.
Ecochard R; Duterque O; Leiva R; Bouchard T; Vigil P
Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1319-25.e3. PubMed ID: 25724738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Findings from a mobile application-based cohort are consistent with established knowledge of the menstrual cycle, fertile window, and conception.
Faust L; Bradley D; Landau E; Noddin K; Farland LV; Baron A; Wolfberg A
Fertil Steril; 2019 Sep; 112(3):450-457.e3. PubMed ID: 31272722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural family planning and sex selection: fact or fiction?
Gray RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):1982-4. PubMed ID: 1836712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation.
Dunson DB; Baird DD; Wilcox AJ; Weinberg CR
Hum Reprod; 1999 Jul; 14(7):1835-9. PubMed ID: 10402400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
