These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12799060)

  • 1. An advanced method in fetal phonocardiography.
    Várady P; Wildt L; Benyó Z; Hein A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Jul; 71(3):283-96. PubMed ID: 12799060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Fetal phonocardiography with a novel approach].
    Várady P; Wildt L
    Orv Hetil; 2001 Sep; 142(36):1971-6. PubMed ID: 11680102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A rule-based phonocardiographic method for long-term fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Kovács F; Török M; Habermajer I
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jan; 47(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 10646287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New Method for Beat-to-Beat Fetal Heart Rate Measurement Using Doppler Ultrasound Signal.
    Kupka T; Matonia A; Jezewski M; Jezewski J; Horoba K; Wrobel J; Czabanski R; Martinek R
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 32707863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real time processing and analysis of fetal phonocardiographic signals.
    Bassil HE; Dripps JH
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1989; 10 Suppl B():67-74. PubMed ID: 2630163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heart rate estimation and validation algorithm for fetal phonocardiography.
    Bhaskaran A; J SK; George S; Arora M
    Physiol Meas; 2022 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 35724646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Passive fetal monitoring by adaptive wavelet denoising method.
    Vaisman S; Salem SY; Holcberg G; Geva AB
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Feb; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 22169397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-invasive fetal monitoring using electrocardiography and phonocardiography: A preliminary study.
    Gobillot S; Fontecave-Jallon J; Equy V; Rivet B; Gumery PY; Hoffmann P
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 47(9):455-459. PubMed ID: 30144558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous monitoring of maternal and fetal heart rate variability during labor in relation with fetal gender.
    Gonçalves H; Fernandes D; Pinto P; Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J
    Dev Psychobiol; 2017 Nov; 59(7):832-839. PubMed ID: 28833043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Phonocardiographic-Based Fiber-Optic Sensor and Adaptive Filtering System for Noninvasive Continuous Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring.
    Martinek R; Nedoma J; Fajkus M; Kahankova R; Konecny J; Janku P; Kepak S; Bilik P; Nazeran H
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28420215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Studies on the cardiotocograms recorded by a new system with 1 MHz ultrasound and autocorrelation heart rate meter].
    Sawazumi K; Nagata N; Irie T; Maeda K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 May; 40(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 3290362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel modality for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Ashwal E; Shinar S; Aviram A; Orbach S; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(6):889-895. PubMed ID: 29096560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a Smart Mobile Data Module for Fetal Monitoring in E-Healthcare.
    Houzé de l'Aulnoit A; Boudet S; Génin M; Gautier PF; Schiro J; Houzé de l'Aulnoit D; Beuscart R
    J Med Syst; 2018 Mar; 42(5):83. PubMed ID: 29572752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal heart rate monitoring device using condenser microphone sensor: Validation and comparison to standard devices.
    Ahmad HAB; El-Badawy IM; Singh OP; Hisham RB; Malarvili MB
    Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 29758955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal heart rate estimation from a single phonocardiogram signal using non-negative matrix factorization.
    Dia N; Fontecave-Jallon J; Gumery PY; Rivet B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5983-5986. PubMed ID: 31947210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive filtering in ECG monitoring of the fetal heart rate.
    Frank TH; Blaumanis OR; Gibbs RK; Wells RK
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():108-13. PubMed ID: 3694088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes undergoing expectant management.
    Li Y; Gonik B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jul; 22(7):589-92. PubMed ID: 19488937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
    Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation of foetal phonocardiographic recordings for testing of FHR extraction algorithms.
    Cesarelli M; Ruffo M; Romano M; Bifulco P
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Sep; 107(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 22178069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.