166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12799543)
1. Impact of digital labeling on outcome measures.
Bentler RA; Niebuhr DP; Johnson TA; Flamme GA
Ear Hear; 2003 Jun; 24(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12799543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
Reber MB; Kompis M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Own voice qualities (OVQ) in hearing-aid users: there is more than just occlusion.
Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Maas P; Nielsen C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 21275499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S
Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing aids and tinnitus therapy: a 25-year experience.
Trotter MI; Donaldson I
J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Oct; 122(10):1052-6. PubMed ID: 18353195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Candidacy for bilateral hearing aids: a retrospective multicenter study.
Boymans M; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Festen JM; Dreschler WA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 18664691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA.
Hickson L; Clutterbuck S; Khan A
Int J Audiol; 2010 Aug; 49(8):586-95. PubMed ID: 20515423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gender and hearing aids: patterns of use and determinants of nonregular use.
Staehelin K; Bertoli S; Probst R; Schindler C; Dratva J; Stutz EZ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e26-37. PubMed ID: 21795978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly.
Chang WH; Tseng HC; Chao TK; Hsu CJ; Liu TC
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 138(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 18503844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness.
Linstrom CJ; Silverman CA; Yu GP
Laryngoscope; 2009 Apr; 119(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 19266579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hearing aid users benefit from induction loop when using digital cellular phones.
Sorri M; Piiparinen P; Huttunen K; Haho M; Tobey E; Thibodeau L; Buckley K
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 12677109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
