348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12799888)
1. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries.
Harold KL; Pollinger H; Matthews BD; Kercher KW; Sing RF; Heniford BT
Surg Endosc; 2003 Aug; 17(8):1228-30. PubMed ID: 12799888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis.
Matthews BD; Pratt BL; Backus CL; Kercher KW; Mostafa G; Lentzner A; Lipford EH; Sing RF; Heniford BT
Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):901-6. PubMed ID: 11565773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study.
Campagnacci R; de Sanctis A; Baldarelli M; Rimini M; Lezoche G; Guerrieri M
Surg Endosc; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1526-31. PubMed ID: 17287913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of linear and torsional mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for the sealing of medium- to large-sized arteries.
Ching SS; McMahon MJ
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1165-9. PubMed ID: 17149550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries.
Carbonell AM; Joels CS; Kercher KW; Matthews BD; Sing RF; Heniford BT
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2003 Dec; 13(6):377-80. PubMed ID: 14733701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of economic bipolar vessel sealer and biclamp for the hemostasis of large-sized cadaver arteries.
Tansatit T; Kulvitit Y; Jindatip D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89 Suppl 3():S169-73. PubMed ID: 17718284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy source instruments for laparoscopic colectomy.
Tou S; Malik AI; Wexner SD; Nelson RL
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 May; (5):CD007886. PubMed ID: 21563161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PlasmaKinetic bipolar vessel sealing: burst pressures and thermal spread in an animal model.
Pietrow PK; Weizer AZ; L'Esperance JO; Auge BK; Silverstein A; Cummings T; Preminger GM; Albala DM
J Endourol; 2005; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 15735394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a Laparoscopic Ferromagnetic Technology-based Vessel Sealing Device and Comparative Study to Ultrasonic and Bipolar Laparoscopic Devices.
Chen J; Jensen CR; Manwaring PK; Glasgow RE
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Apr; 27(2):e12-e17. PubMed ID: 28234706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and efficacy of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer in trauma.
Hope WW; Burns JM; Newcomb WL; Heniford BT; Sing RF
Injury; 2009 May; 40(5):564-6. PubMed ID: 18490017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy.
Takada M; Ichihara T; Kuroda Y
Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):226-8. PubMed ID: 15573241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of electrosurgical vessel-sealing devices in biliary tract surgery in a porcine model.
Hope WW; Padma S; Newcomb WL; Schmelzer TM; Heath JJ; Lincourt AE; Heniford BT; Norton HJ; Martinie JB; Iannitti DA
HPB (Oxford); 2010 Dec; 12(10):703-8. PubMed ID: 21083796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing and thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices.
Noble EJ; Smart NJ; Challand C; Sleigh K; Oriolowo A; Hosie KB
Br J Surg; 2011 Jun; 98(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 21442611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices.
Newcomb WL; Hope WW; Schmelzer TM; Heath JJ; Norton HJ; Lincourt AE; Heniford BT; Iannitti DA
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 18483824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for sealing veins.
Ching SS; Verbeke CS; Homer-Vanniasinkam S; McMahon MJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2008 Dec; 18(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 19105669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the efficacy of the electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealer (LigaSure) devices in sealing lymphatic vessels.
Novitsky YW; Rosen MJ; Harrell AG; Sing RF; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
Surg Innov; 2005 Jun; 12(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 16034506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo comparison of the coagulation capability of SonoSurg and Harmonic Ace on 4 mm and 5 mm arteries.
Clements RH; Palepu R
Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2203-6. PubMed ID: 17479325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing.
Kennedy JS; Stranahan PL; Taylor KD; Chandler JG
Surg Endosc; 1998 Jun; 12(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 9602010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of surgical energy devices for vessel sealing and peripheral energy spread in a porcine model.
Hruby GW; Marruffo FC; Durak E; Collins SM; Pierorazio P; Humphrey PA; Mansukhani MM; Landman J
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2689-93. PubMed ID: 17945280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation and Comparison of Contemporary Energy-Based Surgical Vessel Sealing Devices.
Okhunov Z; Yoon R; Lusch A; Spradling K; Suarez M; Kaler KS; Patel R; Hwang C; Osann K; Huang J; Lee T; Landman J
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):329-337. PubMed ID: 29463122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
