These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12799892)

  • 1. Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Trichak S
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Sep; 17(9):1434-6. PubMed ID: 12799892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the fourth port routinely required for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Our three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience.
    Ciftci A; Yazicioglu MB; Tiryaki C; Turgut HT; Subasi O; Ilgoz M; Civil O; Yildiz SY
    Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 185(4):909-912. PubMed ID: 27582090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases.
    Lee KW; Poon CM; Leung KF; Lee DW; Ko CW
    Hong Kong Med J; 2005 Feb; 11(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 15687513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Poon CM; Chan KW; Lee DW; Chan KC; Ko CW; Cheung HY; Lee KW
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12874694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Tagaya N; Kita J; Takagi K; Imada T; Ishikawa K; Kogure H; Ohyama O
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 1998; 5(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 9880780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients.
    Leggett PL; Bissell CD; Churchman-Winn R; Ahn C
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 11344432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Cerci C; Tarhan OR; Barut I; Bülbül M
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(73):15-6. PubMed ID: 17419222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of the four-port and three-port trocar access of the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy--review of the literature.
    Koichev A
    Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2013; (3):26-38. PubMed ID: 24459764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments.
    Sarli L; Iusco D; Gobbi S; Porrini C; Ferro M; Roncoroni L
    Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1345-8. PubMed ID: 14598412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fundus-down approach.
    Raj PK; Castillo G; Urban L
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2001 Apr; 11(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 11327135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transumbilical multiple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TUMP-LC): a prospective analysis of 50 initial patients.
    Roy P; De A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 Apr; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 20374010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of gallbladder retrieval from an epigastric vs. umbilical port on trocar-site complications A prospective randomized study.
    Kaya C; Bozkurt E; Yazici P
    Ann Ital Chir; 2017; 88():326-329. PubMed ID: 29051399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Single-port transumbilical endoscopic cholecystectomy: a new standard?].
    Jacob DA; Raakow R
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Jul; 135(27):1363-7. PubMed ID: 20589582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal.
    Kumar M; Agrawal CS; Gupta RK
    JSLS; 2007; 11(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 17931519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Safe and Feasible Alternative to the Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Chatterjee A; Kumar R; Chattoraj A
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52196. PubMed ID: 38347985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective clinical trial.
    Emre Telciler K; Ilhan E; Yakan S; Cengiz F; Senlikci A; Aktürk Hayat E
    Minerva Chir; 2014 Feb; 69(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 24675241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Brunei.
    Kok KY; Mathew VV; Tan KK; Yapp SK
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1998 Apr; 8(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 9566565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-port versus needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.
    Hosogi H; Strassel V; Martin C; Sakai Y; Saad S
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 Aug; 4(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 22776275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain.
    Asakuma M; Hayashi M; Komeda K; Shimizu T; Hirokawa F; Miyamoto Y; Okuda J; Tanigawa N
    Br J Surg; 2011 Jul; 98(7):991-5. PubMed ID: 21538340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a three-trocar technique for difficult gallbladders.
    Tuveri M; Tuveri A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Jun; 19(3):415-8. PubMed ID: 19243268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.