These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12799992)

  • 21. Easy and Hard Auditory Tasks Distinguished by Otoacoustic Emissions and Event-related Potentials: Insights into Efferent System Activity.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Milner R; Pilka E; Ganc M; Skarzynski H
    Neuroscience; 2022 May; 491():87-97. PubMed ID: 35398177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
    Sun XM
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.
    Boothalingam S; Kurke J; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 19(4):421-434. PubMed ID: 29736560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 108(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 22457463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Within- and Across-Subject Variability of Repeated Measurements of Medial Olivocochlear-Induced Changes in Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Mertes IB; Goodman SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e72-84. PubMed ID: 26583481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions induced by swept tones.
    Shixiong Chen ; Yanbing Jin ; Lisheng Xu ; Guanglin Li
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():2733-6. PubMed ID: 26736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.
    Lewis JD
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 19(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29134475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Human medial olivocochlear reflex: Contralateral activation effect on low and high frequency cochlear response.
    Jamos AM; Kaf WA; Chertoff ME; Ferraro JA
    Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107925. PubMed ID: 32088636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products.
    Puria S; Guinan JJ; Liberman MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):500-7. PubMed ID: 8568037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Establishing critical differences in ear-canal stimulus amplitude for detecting middle ear muscle reflex activation during olivocochlear efferent measurements.
    Mertes IB
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 31584306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efferent-induced alterations in distortion and reflection otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Mishra SK; Biswal M; Amatya A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):640. PubMed ID: 29495742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.
    Beim JA; Elliott M; Oxenham AJ; Wojtczak M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):613-29. PubMed ID: 26153415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent 'antimasking' and speech-in-noise listening benefits.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
    Neuroreport; 2015 May; 26(8):483-7. PubMed ID: 25919996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of aging on medial olivocochlear system function.
    Lisowska G; Namyslowski G; Orecka B; Misiolek M
    Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():901-14. PubMed ID: 24959071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.
    Boothalingam S; Lineton B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.