These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12800265)

  • 21. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Scanning electron microscopy of marginal fitting of composite resin fillings].
    Székely M; Bocskay I
    Fogorv Sz; 1999 Jun; 92(6):186-90. PubMed ID: 10423922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars.
    Puppin-Rontani RM; de Góes MF; Voelske CE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17073199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of Solitaire-2 restorations placed in United Kingdom general dental practices: 1-year report.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; McDermott K; Lamb JJ; Siddons C; Weller B; Balkenhol M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Sep; 34(8):594-9. PubMed ID: 14620210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of resin-based composite in children.
    Donly KJ; García-Godoy F
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 12412963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. One-year clinical evaluation of an anterior composite resin.
    Saleh N; Peretz B; Rehany Al; Zyskind D; Hirschfeld Z; Stark M
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Aug; 23(8):559-67. PubMed ID: 1410261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Delme KI; Deman PJ; De Moor RJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):676-85. PubMed ID: 16102081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations to dentin in vivo and in vitro.
    Hahn P; Weyen G; Fischer P; Plogmann S; Hannig M
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 19146127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trends in material choice for posterior restorations in an Israeli dental school: composite resin versus amalgam.
    Ben-Gal G; Weiss EI
    J Dent Educ; 2011 Dec; 75(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 22184598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
    Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Kuijs RH
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 18621458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.