These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evaluation of guidelines for peritoneal dialysis patients: a review from the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD). Korevaar J; van Manen JG; Boeschoten EW; Dekker FW; Krediet RT Contrib Nephrol; 2003; (140):142-50. PubMed ID: 12800354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Canadian Society of Nephrology for the treatment of patients with chronic renal failure: a re-examination. Prichard S Contrib Nephrol; 2003; (140):163-9. PubMed ID: 12800356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. European best practice guidelines: adequacy in peritoneal dialysis. Struijk DG; Krediet RT Contrib Nephrol; 2003; (140):170-5. PubMed ID: 12800357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peritoneal dialysis: where is it now and where is it going? Oreopoulos DG; Lobbedez T; Gupta S Int J Artif Organs; 2004 Feb; 27(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 15061471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of the ADEMEX trial. Mujais S; Vonesh E; Abu-Alfa A Contrib Nephrol; 2003; (140):131-41. PubMed ID: 12800353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical interpretation of adequacy parameters in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Henderson LW Perit Dial Int; 1999; 19 Suppl 2():S38-44. PubMed ID: 10406492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ask the expert. Is peritoneal dialysis (CAPD or APD) appropriate for small children with prune belly syndrome and terminal renal failure? Fischbach M Pediatr Nephrol; 2001 Nov; 16(11):936-7. PubMed ID: 11718131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of a center of excellence program in improving the quality of peritoneal dialysis--a Chinese experience. Yao Q; Zhou G Perit Dial Int; 2014 Jun; 34 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S59-62. PubMed ID: 24962965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationships between creatinine clearances and Kt/V in peritoneal dialysis patients: a critique of the DOQI document. Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative, National Kidney Foundation. Twardowski ZJ Perit Dial Int; 1998; 18(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 9663887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing clinical performance measures based on the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines: process, outcomes, and implications. Sugarman JR; Frederick PR; Frankenfield DL; Owen WF; McClellan WM; Am J Kidney Dis; 2003 Oct; 42(4):806-12. PubMed ID: 14520632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cycler adequacy and prescription data in a national cohort sample: the 1997 core indicators report. Health Care Financing Administration Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study Group. Rocco MV; Flanigan MJ; Prowant B; Frederick P; Frankenfield DL Kidney Int; 1999 May; 55(5):2030-9. PubMed ID: 10231468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A summary of the 2000 update of the NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines on peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Golper TA; Perit Dial Int; 2001; 21(5):438-40. PubMed ID: 11757825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of the DOQI recommendations for peritoneal dialysis. Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative, National Kidney Foundation. Blake PG Perit Dial Int; 1998; 18(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9663886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in clinical indicators of care for adult peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States from 1995 to 1997. ESRD Core Indicators Workgroup. Frankenfield DL; Prowant BF; Flanigan MJ; Frederick PR; Bailie GR; Helgerson SD; Rocco MV Kidney Int; 1999 May; 55(5):1998-2010. PubMed ID: 10231465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]