233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12801254)
1. Practical model-based dose-finding in phase I clinical trials: methods based on toxicity.
Thall PF; Lee SJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 12801254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.
Chiuzan C; Dehbi HM
Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38618916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
Paoletti X; Kramar A
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simulation study of methods for selecting subgroup-specific doses in phase 1 trials.
Morita S; Thall PF; Takeda K
Pharm Stat; 2017 Mar; 16(2):143-156. PubMed ID: 28111916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative review of novel model-assisted designs for phase I clinical trials.
Zhou H; Murray TA; Pan H; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(14):2208-2222. PubMed ID: 29682777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior maximization and averaging for Bayesian working model choice in the continual reassessment method.
Daimon T; Zohar S; O'Quigley J
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1563-73. PubMed ID: 21351288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dose-finding approach based on shrunken predictive probability for combinations of two agents in phase I trials.
Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Matsui S
Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4515-25. PubMed ID: 23650098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.
Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM
Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.
Abbas R; Rossoni C; Jaki T; Paoletti X; Mozgunov P
Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 32631095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The continual reassessment method and its applications: a Bayesian methodology for phase I cancer clinical trials.
Ishizuka N; Ohashi Y
Stat Med; 2001 Sep 15-30; 20(17-18):2661-81. PubMed ID: 11523075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.
Ji Y; Wang SJ
J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 31(14):1785-91. PubMed ID: 23569307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phase I trial design for drug combinations with Bayesian model averaging.
Jin IH; Huo L; Yin G; Yuan Y
Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25641851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: illustrations and practical considerations.
Thall PF; Cook JD; Estey EH
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):623-38. PubMed ID: 17037262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies.
Tang N; Wang S; Ye G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):172. PubMed ID: 30563454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian adaptive design for cancer phase I trials using a flexible range of doses.
Tighiouart M; Cook-Wiens G; Rogatko A
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):562-574. PubMed ID: 28858566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A default method to specify skeletons for Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials.
Pan H; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):266-279. PubMed ID: 26991076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.
Gerke O; Siedentop H
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5329-44. PubMed ID: 17849502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A curve-free method for phase I clinical trials.
Gasparini M; Eisele J
Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):609-15. PubMed ID: 10877324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
