These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12801291)

  • 1. Preliminary in vitro evaluation of Carisolv as a root canal irrigant.
    Al-Kilani MG; Whitworth JM; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2003 Jun; 36(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 12801291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carisolv: an alternative to NaOCl in immature root canals?
    Rahman S; Whitworth JM; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15946265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carisolv as an endodontic irrigant in deciduous teeth: an SEM study.
    Singhal P; Das UM; Vishwanathan D; Singhal A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):120-1. PubMed ID: 22842265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of the root canal smear layer using Carisolv III and sodium hypochlorite.
    Wu D; Ma YZ; Jia J; Xin BC; Wang DS; Sun DG; Wang LX
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 May; 99(22):e20372. PubMed ID: 32481420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning electron microscopic study of the cleaning ability of chlorhexidine as a root-canal irrigant.
    Yamashita JC; Tanomaru Filho M; Leonardo MR; Rossi MA; Silva LA
    Int Endod J; 2003 Jun; 36(6):391-4. PubMed ID: 12801285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation.
    Guerisoli DM; Marchesan MA; Walmsley AD; Lumley PJ; Pecora JD
    Int Endod J; 2002 May; 35(5):418-21. PubMed ID: 12059911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study.
    Solovyeva AM; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2000 Nov; 33(6):494-504. PubMed ID: 11307252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
    Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
    Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of Carisolv on root canal cleanness in chemomechanical preparation].
    Zhan FL; Shao LN; Wang XL; Pan YP
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 18989599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of preparation technique and sodium hypochlorite on removal of pulp and predentine from root canals of posterior teeth.
    Evans GE; Speight PM; Gulabivala K
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 11482145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments.
    Gambarini G; Laszkiewicz J
    Int Endod J; 2002 May; 35(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 12059912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.
    Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
    Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
    Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.
    Ghivari S; Kubasad G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.