These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12802822)

  • 1. Comparing longitudinal binary outcomes in an observational oral health study.
    Shelton BJ; Gilbert GH; Lu Z; Bradshaw P; Chavers LS; Howard G
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(12):2057-70. PubMed ID: 12802822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A SAS macro for the analysis of multivariate longitudinal binary outcomes.
    Shelton BJ; Gilbert GH; Liu B; Fisher M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Nov; 76(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 15451165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials.
    Ivanova A; Barrier RC; Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1537-46. PubMed ID: 15723426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlling for systematic selection in retrospective analyses: an application to fluoxetine and sertraline prescribing in the United Kingdom.
    Neslusan CA; Hylan TR; Dunn RL; Donoghue J
    Value Health; 1999; 2(6):435-45. PubMed ID: 16674330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note on the use of unbiased estimating equations to estimate correlation in analysis of longitudinal trials.
    Sun W; Shults J; Leonard M
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 19197953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating treatment efficacy over time: a logistic regression model for binary longitudinal outcomes.
    Choi L; Dominici F; Zeger SL; Ouyang P
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2789-805. PubMed ID: 16134133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
    Steiner PM; Cook TD; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):250-67. PubMed ID: 20822251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE.
    Jung SH; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2583-96. PubMed ID: 16118812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical issues in longitudinal and observational studies: purpose, short versus long term, selection of study instruments, methods, outcomes, and biases.
    Wolfe F
    J Rheumatol; 1999 Feb; 26(2):469-72. PubMed ID: 9972989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using propensity scores subclassification to estimate effects of longitudinal treatments: an example using a new diabetes medication.
    Segal JB; Griswold M; Achy-Brou A; Herbert R; Bass EB; Dy SM; Millman AE; Wu AW; Frangakis CE
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S149-57. PubMed ID: 17909374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A selection-bias free method to estimate the prevalence of hypertension from an administrative primary health care database in the Girona Health Region, Spain.
    Saez M; Barceló MA; Coll de Tuero G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Mar; 93(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 19059668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health-related quality of life, satisfaction, and economic outcome measures in studies of prostate cancer screening and treatment, 1990-2000.
    McNaughton-Collins M; Walker-Corkery E; Barry MJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2004; (33):78-101. PubMed ID: 15504921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.
    Klungel OH; Martens EP; Psaty BM; Grobbee DE; Sullivan SD; Stricker BH; Leufkens HG; de Boer A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 15617947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Insufficient evidence to support or refute the need for 6-monthly dental check-ups. What is the optimal recall frequency between dental checks?
    Mettes D
    Evid Based Dent; 2005; 6(3):62-3. PubMed ID: 16184154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A sensitivity analysis for shared-parameter models for incomplete longitudinal outcomes.
    Creemers A; Hens N; Aerts M; Molenberghs G; Verbeke G; Kenward MG
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 19937996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Joint analysis of multiple longitudinal outcomes: application of a latent class model.
    Putter H; Vos T; de Haes H; van Houwelingen H
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6228-49. PubMed ID: 18816496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling association in longitudinal binary outcomes: a brief review.
    Kuchibhatla M; Fillenbaum GG
    Aging Ment Health; 2005 May; 9(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 16019273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.