881 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12803207)
1. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
Smith GG
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
Weissbourd R
John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term.
Wing KR; Carman R
Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
Grant GM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rights of the mentally handicapped: which way in the 1980s?
Friedman PR
Trial; 1981 Feb; 17(2):43-46, 60-61. PubMed ID: 11651746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
Gallo LV
Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Due process--involuntary civil confinement: a right to rehabilitative treatment?
Vermillion LJ
ISL Law Rev; 1976; 1(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11664678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty.
Cooper GG
Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Postadmission due process for mentally ill and mentally retarded children after Parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles.
Joseph BC
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 29(1):129-57. PubMed ID: 11665106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
Zenoff EH; Zients AB
George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
