These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12803295)

  • 61. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in the newborn canine.
    Gotshall RW; Miles DS
    Crit Care Med; 1989 Jan; 17(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 2909322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
    Belardinelli R; Ciampani N; Costantini C; Blandini A; Purcaro A
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jun; 77(15):1293-301. PubMed ID: 8677869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.
    Thomas AN; Ryan J; Doran BR; Pollard BJ
    Intensive Care Med; 1991; 17(7):383-6. PubMed ID: 1774390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Evaluation of cardiac parameters using electrical impedance plethysmography.
    Corciovă C; Turnea M; Matei D; Andritoi D
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2012; 116(3):927-32. PubMed ID: 23272554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. An evaluation of the ensemble averaged impedance cardiogram.
    Kelsey RM; Guethlein W
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Jan; 27(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 2339185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Poor accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioimpedance cardiography [PhysioFlow(R)] compared to magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.
    Taylor K; Manlhiot C; McCrindle B; Grosse-Wortmann L; Holtby H
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Apr; 114(4):771-5. PubMed ID: 22314693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
    Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure.
    Albert NM; Hail MD; Li J; Young JB
    Am J Crit Care; 2004 Nov; 13(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 15568652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance.
    Cotter G; Moshkovitz Y; Kaluski E; Cohen AJ; Miller H; Goor D; Vered Z
    Chest; 2004 Apr; 125(4):1431-40. PubMed ID: 15078756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Performance of three minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring systems.
    de Wilde RB; Geerts BF; Cui J; van den Berg PC; Jansen JR
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jul; 64(7):762-9. PubMed ID: 19624632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [The dependability of noninvasive stroke volume measurements with impedance cardiography].
    Slany J; Mösslacher H; Kronik G; Schmoliner R
    Acta Med Austriaca; 1978; 5(4-5):118-21. PubMed ID: 756116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Impedance cardiography: non-invasive cardiac output measurement after burn injury.
    Griffths RW; Philpot ME; Chapman BJ; Munday KA
    Int J Tissue React; 1981 Mar; 3(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 7287057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Impedance cardiography for monitoring changes in cardiac output.
    Parashar R; Bajpai M; Goyal M; Singh S; Tiwari S; Narayan VS
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 23387239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Non-invasive assessment of gestational hemodynamics: benefits and limitations of impedance cardiography versus other techniques.
    Staelens A; Tomsin K; Grieten L; Oben J; Mesens T; Spaanderman M; Jacquemyn Y; Gyselaers W
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2013 Nov; 10(6):765-79. PubMed ID: 24195460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Monitoring of cardiac output by pulse contour method.
    Thomas B
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1978; 29(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 751431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Semicontinuous cardiac output monitoring using a neural network.
    Healey C; Orr J; Westenskow D
    Crit Care Med; 1999 Aug; 27(8):1505-10. PubMed ID: 10470757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Transthoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution technique for cardiac output measurement during mechanical ventilation.
    Tremper K
    Intensive Care Med; 1989; 15(4):219-20. PubMed ID: 2745863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Improvement in intracardiac impedance volumes by field extrapolation.
    Salo RW
    Eur Heart J; 1992 Nov; 13 Suppl E():35-9. PubMed ID: 1478207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Continuous noninvasive cardiac output: are we getting there?
    Tremper KK
    Crit Care Med; 1987 Mar; 15(3):278-9. PubMed ID: 3816266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Modified scaled Fourier linear combiner in thoracic impedance cardiography.
    Ishiguro T; Umezu A; Yasuda Y; Horihata S; Kardec Barros A
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 Sep; 36(9):997-1013. PubMed ID: 16081060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.