These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12803819)

  • 1. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA based on a modified one-step M-estimator.
    Wilcox RR; Keselman HJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):15-25. PubMed ID: 12803819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of robust tests for spread: asymmetric trimming strategies.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Algina J; Othman AR; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):235-53. PubMed ID: 18433520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust step-down tests for multivariate independent group designs.
    Lix LM; Fouladi RT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):245-65. PubMed ID: 17971269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Design and power analysis: n and confidence intervals of means].
    García JF; Pascual J; Frías MD; Van Krunckelsven D; Murgui S
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 18940106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust ANCOVA using a smoother with bootstrap bagging.
    Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):427-37. PubMed ID: 18652737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interval estimates of weighted effect sizes in the one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Kulinskaya E; Staudte RG
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16709281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing measures of the 'typical' score across treatment groups.
    Othman AR; Keselman HJ; Padmanabhan AR; Wilcox RR; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 Nov; 57(Pt 2):215-34. PubMed ID: 15511305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Generalization of the Brown-Forsythe approach to factorial designs].
    Vallejo Seco G; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):969-73. PubMed ID: 18940112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysing multitrait-multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator: what sample size is needed for valid results?
    Nussbeck FW; Eid M; Lischetzke T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):195-213. PubMed ID: 16709286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modern robust data analysis methods: measures of central tendency.
    Wilcox RR; Keselman HJ
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):254-74. PubMed ID: 14596490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results.
    Wright DB
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2006 Sep; 76(Pt 3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16953968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing two independent groups: a test based on a one-step M-estimator and bootstrap-t.
    Özdemir AF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):322-37. PubMed ID: 22708512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeated measures ANOVA: some new results on comparing trimmed means and means.
    Wilcox RR; Keselman HJ; Muska J; Cribbie R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 May; 53 ( Pt 1)():69-82. PubMed ID: 10895523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pairwise multiple comparisons: a model comparison approach versus stepwise procedures.
    Cribbie RA; Keselman HJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):167-82. PubMed ID: 12803829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [How to fit and interpret multilevel models using SPSS].
    Pardo A; Ruiz MA; San Martín R
    Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):308-21. PubMed ID: 17425904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.