136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12803820)
1. Dynamical system approach to factor analysis parameter estimation.
Trendafilov NT
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):27-46. PubMed ID: 12803820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence curves for factor loadings.
Kwan CW; Fung WK
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):345-58. PubMed ID: 16293205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fitting polytomous Rasch models in SAS.
Christensen KB
J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 17068380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.
Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(6):1292-306. PubMed ID: 17100485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A fast method for choosing the numbers of components in Tucker3 analysis.
Kiers HA; der Kinderen A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):119-25. PubMed ID: 12803826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generalized latent variable models with non-linear effects.
Rizopoulos D; Moustaki I
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):415-38. PubMed ID: 17535487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities.
Bauer DJ; Curran PJ
Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 15053717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Generalization of the Brown-Forsythe approach to factorial designs].
Vallejo Seco G; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):969-73. PubMed ID: 18940112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the impact of partial factorial invariance on selection in two populations.
Millsap RE; Kwok OM
Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):93-115. PubMed ID: 15053721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymptotic expansion of the distributions of the estimators in factor analysis under non-normality.
Ogasawara H
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):395-420. PubMed ID: 17971277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple imputation for item scores when test data are factorially complex.
van Ginkel JR; van der Ark LA; Sijtsma K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):315-37. PubMed ID: 17971272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints.
Stoel RD; Garre FG; Dolan C; van den Wittenboer G
Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):439-55. PubMed ID: 17154756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stochastic EM for estimating the parameters of a multilevel IRT model.
Fox JP
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):65-81. PubMed ID: 12803822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pairwise multiple comparisons: a model comparison approach versus stepwise procedures.
Cribbie RA; Keselman HJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):167-82. PubMed ID: 12803829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size planning for the standardized mean difference: accuracy in parameter estimation via narrow confidence intervals.
Kelley K; Rausch JR
Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):363-85. PubMed ID: 17154752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The future of dynamic factor analysis in psychology and biomedicine.
Molenaar PC
Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 2006; (2):201-13. PubMed ID: 17124797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the statistical significance of relative weights.
Tonidandel S; Lebreton JM; Johnson JW
Psychol Methods; 2009 Dec; 14(4):387-99. PubMed ID: 19968399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
