251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12804682)
1. Measuring duration mismatch negativity.
Jacobsen T; Schröger E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 114(6):1133-43. PubMed ID: 12804682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finding the right control: the mismatch negativity under investigation.
Ruhnau P; Herrmann B; Schröger E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 123(3):507-12. PubMed ID: 21839676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preattentive auditory change detection relies on unitary sensory memory representations.
Czigler I; Winkler I
Neuroreport; 1996 Nov; 7(15-17):2413-7. PubMed ID: 8981394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal integration of deviant sound in automatic detection reflected by mismatch negativity.
Shiga T; Yabe H; Yu L; Nozaki M; Itagaki S; Lan TH; Niwa S
Neuroreport; 2011 May; 22(7):337-41. PubMed ID: 21502927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in the duration and frequency of deviant stimuli engender different mismatch negativity patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy.
Hirose Y; Hara K; Miyajima M; Matsuda A; Maehara T; Hara M; Matsushima E; Ohta K; Matsuura M
Epilepsy Behav; 2014 Feb; 31():136-42. PubMed ID: 24412859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Memory-based mismatch response to changes in duration of auditory stimuli: an MEG study.
Hsu WY; Cheng CH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 121(10):1744-50. PubMed ID: 20471314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Event-related potential features indexing central auditory discrimination by newborns.
Ceponiene R; Kushnerenko E; Fellman V; Renlund M; Suominen K; Näätänen R
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 11867255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cascade and no-repetition rules are comparable controls for the auditory frequency mismatch negativity in oddball tasks.
Wiens S; Szychowska M; Eklund R; van Berlekom E
Psychophysiology; 2019 Jan; 56(1):e13280. PubMed ID: 30246255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration.
Jaramillo M; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R
Neurosci Lett; 2000 Aug; 290(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 10936687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
Kimura M; Schröger E; Czigler I; Ohira H
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of large-scale memory organization in the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential.
Winkler I; Schröger E; Cowan N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Jan; 13(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11224909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
Todd J; Myers R; Pirillo R; Drysdale K
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():113-23. PubMed ID: 19914219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.
Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BE; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P; Kei J; Sockalingam R; Chenery HJ
Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 15179119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A modified oddball paradigm "cross-modal delayed response" and the research on mismatch negativity.
Wei JH; Chan TC; Luo YJ
Brain Res Bull; 2002 Jan; 57(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 11849829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm.
Li X; Lu Y; Sun G; Gao L; Zhao L
Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Feb; 8():7. PubMed ID: 22300600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
