111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12804704)
1. Independent calculations to validate monitor units from ADAC treatment planning system.
Ayyangar KM; Saw CB; Gearheart D; Shen B; Thompson R
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 12804704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of monitor units calculated by radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification software.
Sellakumar P; Arun C; Sanjay SS; Ramesh SB
Phys Med; 2011 Jan; 27(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 20172756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements of primary off-axis ratios in wedged asymmetric photon fields: a formalism for dose and monitor unit calculations.
Mihailidis DN; Tomara PD; Gibbons JP
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2003-14. PubMed ID: 15843733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Is there a future for dosimetry control by portal imaging?].
Huyskens DP
Cancer Radiother; 2000 Nov; 4 Suppl 1():36s-43s. PubMed ID: 11194963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges in Pinnacle treatment planning system.
Alaei P; Higgins PD; Gerbi BJ
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 16275565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of GEANT4 radiation transport toolkit to dose calculations in anthropomorphic phantoms.
Rodrigues P; Trindade A; Peralta L; Alves C; Chaves A; Lopes MC
Appl Radiat Isot; 2004 Dec; 61(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 15388147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving dose homogeneity in large breasts by IMRT: efficacy and dosimetric accuracy of different techniques.
Abo-Madyan Y; Polednik M; Rahn A; Schneider F; Dobler B; Wenz F; Lohr F
Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18259700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contralateral breast doses following radiotherapy of the breast and regional lymph nodes: Measurements and treatment planning calculations.
Johansen S; Olsen DR; Danielsen T; Malinen E
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 16962677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The development and investigation of a prototype three-dimensional compensator for whole brain radiation therapy.
Keall P; Arief I; Shamas S; Weiss E; Castle S
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2267-76. PubMed ID: 18401061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric verification of modulated electron radiotherapy delivered using a photon multileaf collimator for intact breasts.
Jin L; Ma CM; Fan J; Eldib A; Price RA; Chen L; Wang L; Chi Z; Xu Q; Sherif M; Li JS
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):6009-25. PubMed ID: 18836222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elements of commissioning step-and-shoot IMRT: delivery equipment and planning system issues posed by small segment dimensions and small monitor units.
Aspradakis MM; Lambert GD; Steele A
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 16275566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: results of IAEA pilot study.
Gershkevitsh E; Schmidt R; Velez G; Miller D; Korf E; Yip F; Wanwilairat S; Vatnitsky S
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Dec; 89(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 18701178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitor unit calculation for tangential breast treatments: verification in an anthropomorphic phantom.
Howlett SJ; Kron T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 12132946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of calculation algorithms implemented in different commercial planning systems on an anthropomorphic breast phantom using film dosimetry.
Polednik M; Abo Madyan Y; Schneider F; Wolff D; Bannach B; Lambrecht U; Wallin A; Cwiekala M; Maurer K; Reif F; Lohr F; Wenz F;
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Dec; 183(12):667-72. PubMed ID: 18040610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy of 172 patients treated for various disease sites: comparison of EBT film dosimetry, ion chamber measurements, and independent MU calculations.
Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM; Pavlonnis G; Shumway R; Kaplan B; VanRooy E
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 18973859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dose verification method using a monitor unit matrix for dynamic IMRT on Varian linear accelerators.
Chen X; Yue NJ; Chen W; Saw CB; Heron DE; Stefanik D; Antemann R; Huq MS
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5641-52. PubMed ID: 16306658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
