140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12804710)
21. High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy in a patient with bilateral hip prostheses planned using megavoltage computed tomography images acquired with a helical tomotherapy unit.
Holly R; Myrehaug S; Kamran A; Sankreacha R; Morton G
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 19041281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total hip prosthesis metal-artifact suppression using iterative deblurring reconstruction.
Robertson DD; Yuan J; Wang G; Vannier MW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 9071303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Metallic artifact mitigation and organ-constrained tissue assignment for Monte Carlo calculations of permanent implant lung brachytherapy.
Sutherland JG; Miksys N; Furutani KM; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011712. PubMed ID: 24387504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated algorithm for CBCT-based dose calculations of prostate radiotherapy with bilateral hip prostheses.
Almatani T; Hugtenburg RP; Lewis RD; Barley SE; Edwards MA
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160443. PubMed ID: 27461069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prostate treatment with helical TomoTherapy in patients with bilateral hip prostheses--two case studies.
Kling J; Patel KM
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22884740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dosimetric impact of using a commercial metal artifact reduction tool in carbon ion therapy in patients with hip prostheses.
Zhao J; Wang W; Shahnaz K; Wu X; Mao J; Li P; Zhang Q
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):224-234. PubMed ID: 34159721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography caused by hip endoprostheses using a physics-based approach.
Prell D; Kyriakou Y; Kachelrie M; Kalender WA
Invest Radiol; 2010 Nov; 45(11):747-54. PubMed ID: 20661145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of dental metal artifacts on head and neck IMRT dose distributions.
Kim Y; Tomé WA; Bal M; McNutt TR; Spies L
Radiother Oncol; 2006 May; 79(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 16677729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Implementation of a novel algorithm for generating synthetic CT images from magnetic resonance imaging data sets for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Kim J; Glide-Hurst C; Doemer A; Wen N; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25442341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improved Image Quality in Head and Neck CT Using a 3D Iterative Approach to Reduce Metal Artifact.
Wuest W; May MS; Brand M; Bayerl N; Krauss A; Uder M; Lell M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Oct; 36(10):1988-93. PubMed ID: 26272971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prostate cancer: contouring target and organs at risk by kilovoltage and megavoltage CT and MRI in patients with and without hip prostheses.
Falcinelli L; Palumbo I; Radicchia V; Arcidiacono F; Lancellotta V; Montesi G; Matrone F; Zucchetti C; Marcantonini M; Bini V; Aristei C
Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150509. PubMed ID: 26462970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy planning: Investigation of dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based dose planning.
Lambert J; Greer PB; Menk F; Patterson J; Parker J; Dahl K; Gupta S; Capp A; Wratten C; Tang C; Kumar M; Dowling J; Hauville S; Hughes C; Fisher K; Lau P; Denham JW; Salvado O
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Mar; 98(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 21339009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of metal artifacts in MVCT systems using a model based correction method.
Paudel MR; Mackenzie M; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6297-308. PubMed ID: 23039665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implications of artefacts reduction in the planning CT originating from implanted fiducial markers.
Kassim I; Joosten H; Barnhoorn JC; Heijmen BJ; Dirkx ML
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 20435466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography.
May MS; Wüst W; Brand M; Stahl C; Allmendinger T; Schmidt B; Uder M; Lell MM
Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):465-70. PubMed ID: 21467948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment.
Zhang X; Dong L; Lee AK; Cox JD; Kuban DA; Zhu RX; Wang X; Li Y; Newhauser WD; Gillin M; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Feb; 67(2):620-9. PubMed ID: 17236979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reducing metal artifacts in cone-beam CT images by preprocessing projection data.
Zhang Y; Zhang L; Zhu XR; Lee AK; Chambers M; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):924-32. PubMed ID: 17161556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A simulation of MRI based dose calculations on the basis of radiotherapy planning CT images.
Eilertsen K; Vestad LN; Geier O; Skretting A
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(7):1294-302. PubMed ID: 18663645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetric impact of orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) on Spine SBRT patients.
Shen ZL; Xia P; Klahr P; Djemil T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):106-116. PubMed ID: 26699295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
