These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12804876)

  • 1. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes.
    Hanski I; Ovaskainen O
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Aug; 64(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 12804876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity.
    Ovaskainen O; Hanski I
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):281-302. PubMed ID: 11878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A spatially structured metapopulation model with patch dynamics.
    Xu D; Feng Z; Allen LJ; Swihart RK
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Apr; 239(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 16199058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of patch quality and network structure on patch occupancy dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot metapopulation.
    Ozgul A; Armitage KB; Blumstein DT; Vanvuren DH; Oli MK
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jan; 75(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16903056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metapopulation persistence in heterogeneous landscapes: lessons about the effect of stochasticity.
    Frank K
    Am Nat; 2005 Mar; 165(3):374-88. PubMed ID: 15729667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogeneity and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal.
    Schooley RL; Branch LC
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1708-22. PubMed ID: 19831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics.
    Hodgson JA; Moilanen A; Thomas CD
    Ecology; 2009 Jun; 90(6):1608-19. PubMed ID: 19569375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Species traits, patch turnover and successional dynamics: when does intermediate disturbance favour metapopulation occupancy?
    Mestre F; Pita R; Mira A; Beja P
    BMC Ecol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 31900154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes.
    Ovaskainen O; Sato K; Bascompte J; Hanski I
    J Theor Biol; 2002 Mar; 215(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 12051987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Connecting deterministic and stochastic metapopulation models.
    Barbour AD; McVinish R; Pollett PK
    J Math Biol; 2015 Dec; 71(6-7):1481-504. PubMed ID: 25735440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metapopulation persistence in random fragmented landscapes.
    Grilli J; Barabás G; Allesina S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004251. PubMed ID: 25993004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches.
    Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The limiting behaviour of a stochastic patch occupancy model.
    McVinish R; Pollett PK
    J Math Biol; 2013 Sep; 67(3):693-716. PubMed ID: 22847251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Merging spatial and temporal structure within a metapopulation model.
    DeWoody YD; Feng Z; Swihart RK
    Am Nat; 2005 Jul; 166(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 15937788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metapopulation capacity determines food chain length in fragmented landscapes.
    Wang S; Brose U; van Nouhuys S; Holt RD; Loreau M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Aug; 118(34):. PubMed ID: 34417316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastic models for mainland-island metapopulations in static and dynamic landscapes.
    Ross JV
    Bull Math Biol; 2006 Feb; 68(2):417-49. PubMed ID: 16794938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of habitat disturbance and recovery in metapopulation persistence.
    Wilcox C; Cairns BJ; Possingham HP
    Ecology; 2006 Apr; 87(4):855-63. PubMed ID: 16676529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metapopulation persistence in a dynamic landscape: more habitat or better stewardship?
    Ross JV; Sirl DJ; Pollett PK; Possingham HP
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):590-8. PubMed ID: 18488619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology.
    Howell PE; Muths E; Hossack BR; Sigafus BH; Chandler RB
    Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 29453767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intermediate disturbance in experimental landscapes improves persistence of beetle metapopulations.
    Govindan BN; Feng Z; DeWoody YD; Swihart RK
    Ecology; 2015 Mar; 96(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 26236869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.