These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Who owns federally funded research? The Supreme court and the Bayh-Dole act. Kesselheim AS; Rajkumar R N Engl J Med; 2011 Sep; 365(13):1167-9. PubMed ID: 21879888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Intellectual property. DuPont ups ante on use of Harvard's OncoMouse. Marshall E Science; 2002 May; 296(5571):1212. PubMed ID: 12016275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Intellectual property. Patent suit pits postdoc against former mentor. Marshall E Science; 2000 Mar; 287(5462):2399-401. PubMed ID: 10766614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Legal battle threatens universities' use of patented technologies. Ready T Nat Med; 2004 Jan; 10(1):5. PubMed ID: 14702608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now. Boettiger S; Bennett AB Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 16525405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. No room for experiment: the Federal Circuit's narrow construction of the experimental use defense. Ludwig SP; Chumney JC Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):453. PubMed ID: 12665827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Patent law--claim construction--U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts finds conflict on Federal Circuit and holds that product-by-process claims are not limited by their process steps. -- Trustees of Columbia University v. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, 126 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D. Mass. 2000). Harv Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 115(3):923-30. PubMed ID: 11958232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Biotechs sue Columbia over fourth Axel patent. Howard K Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):955-6. PubMed ID: 12949538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Transferring innovation. Kesan JP Fordham Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 77(5):2169-223. PubMed ID: 19431909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. NIH gets a share of BRCA1 patent. Marshall E Science; 1995 Feb; 267(5201):1086. PubMed ID: 7855586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. US jury split over hormone patent case.. Dalton R Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):512. PubMed ID: 10376586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Intellectual property. High court reins in patent pirates. Malakoff D Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778-9. PubMed ID: 12052924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Are university researchers at risk for patent infringement? Yancey A; Stewart CN Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1225-8. PubMed ID: 17989680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Access to tangible research materials in biomedical research: conditions of access and their effect on research. Monotti AL J Law Med; 2006 Aug; 14(1):86-101. PubMed ID: 16937783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]