BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12805721)

  • 1. The current status of microscopical hair comparisons.
    Rowe WF
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2001 Dec; 1():868-78. PubMed ID: 12805721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microscopical discrimination of human head hairs sharing a mitochondrial haplogroup.
    Koch SL; Liebowitz C; Shriver MD; Jablonski NG
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 32956521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of major factors contributing to errors in human hair association by microscopy.
    Smith SL; Linch CA
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1999 Sep; 20(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 10507796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic Human Hair Examination and Comparison in the 21st Century.
    Houck MM
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2005 Jan; 17(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 26257110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capillary electrophoresis in court: the landmark decision of the People of Tennessee versus Ware.
    Marchi E; Pasacreta RJ
    J Capillary Electrophor; 1997; 4(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 9627830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: the state of the law and the science.
    Penrod SD; Fulero SM; Cutler BL
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):229-59. PubMed ID: 10150378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.
    Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 11725885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The expert witness. Neither Frye nor Daubert solved the problem: what can be done?
    Kaufman HH
    Sci Justice; 2001; 41(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 11215302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microscopical discrimination of twins' head hair.
    Bisbing RE; Wolner MF
    J Forensic Sci; 1984 Jul; 29(3):780-6. PubMed ID: 6540293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meeting a Forensic Podiatry Admissibility Challenge: A Daubert Case Study.
    Nirenberg M
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 May; 61(3):833-841. PubMed ID: 27122428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation of human hair by colour and diameter using light microscopy, digital imaging and statistical analysis.
    Mills M; Bonetti J; Brettell T; Quarino L
    J Microsc; 2018 Apr; 270(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 28960300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.
    Thatcher RW; Biver CJ; North DM
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2003 Apr; 34(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12784902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
    Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of microscopic and mitochondrial DNA hair comparisons.
    Houck MM; Budowle B
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):964-7. PubMed ID: 12353582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judicial acceptance of hair tests for substances of abuse in the United States courts: scientific, forensic, and ethical aspects.
    Huestis MA
    Ther Drug Monit; 1996 Aug; 18(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 8857568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphological and chemical profiling for forensic hair examination: A review of quantitative methods.
    Funes DSH; Bonilla K; Baudelet M; Bridge C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 May; 346():111622. PubMed ID: 37001429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
    Grivas CR; Komar DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.