These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12805896)

  • 1. Minimizing adverse environmental impact: how murky the waters.
    Super RW; Gordon DK
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2 Suppl 1():219-37. PubMed ID: 12805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using attainment of the designated aquatic life use to determine adverse environmental impact.
    Seegert G
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():1273-80. PubMed ID: 12805943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A holistic look at minimizing adverse environmental impact under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act.
    Veil JA; Puder MG; Littleton DJ; Johnson N
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Apr; 2 Suppl 1():41-57. PubMed ID: 12805978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse environmental impact: 30-year search for a definition.
    Mayhew DA; Muessig PH; Jensen LD
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():21-9. PubMed ID: 12806014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Clean Water Act Section 316(b) policy options.
    Kadvany J
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():106-38. PubMed ID: 12805939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining "adverse environmental impact" and making paragraph 316(b) decisions: a fisheries management approach.
    Bailey DE; Bulleit KA
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():147-68. PubMed ID: 12805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
    Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
    Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposed methods and endpoints for defining and assessing adverse environmental impact (AEI) on fish communities/populations in Tennessee River reservoirs.
    Hickman GD; Brown ML
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2 Suppl 1():204-18. PubMed ID: 12805895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvements in biosolids quality resulting from the Clean Water Act.
    Hundal LS; Kumar K; Cox A; Zhang H; Granato T
    Water Environ Res; 2014 Feb; 86(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 24645543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A process for evaluating adverse environmental impacts by cooling-water system entrainment at a California power plant.
    Ehrler CP; Steinbeck JR; Laman EA; Hedgepeth JB; Skalski JR; Mayer DL
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():81-105. PubMed ID: 12805938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subsurface agricultural irrigation drainage: the need for regulation.
    Lemly AD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Apr; 17(2 Pt 1):157-80. PubMed ID: 8484025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental management with knowledge of uncertainty: a methylmercury case study.
    Hope BK; Lut A; Aldrich G; Rubin J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 17283603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement error affects risk estimates for recruitment to the Hudson River stock of striped bass.
    Dunning DJ; Ross QE; Munch SB; Ginzburg LR
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2 Suppl 1():238-53. PubMed ID: 12805897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the digital opacity compliance system under regulatory enforcement conditions.
    McFarland MJ; Rasmussen SL; Stone DA; Palmer GR; Wander JD
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Sep; 56(9):1260-6. PubMed ID: 17004681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical issues affecting the implementation of US Environmental Protection Agency's proposed fish tissue-based aquatic criterion for selenium.
    Lemly AD; Skorupa JP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Oct; 3(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 18046804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A blueprint for the problem formulation phase of EPA-type ecological risk assessments for 316(b) determinations.
    Van Winkle W; Dey WP; Jinks SM; Bevlhimer MS; Coutant CC
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2 Suppl 1():271-98. PubMed ID: 12805899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pesticide registration in the United States: overview and new directions.
    Culleen LE
    Qual Assur; 1994 Sep; 3(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 7804650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population level impacts of cooling water withdrawals on harvested fish stocks.
    Newbold SC; Iovanna R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2108-14. PubMed ID: 17438750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indicators of AEI applied to the Delaware Estuary.
    Barnthouse LW; Heimbuch DG; Anthony VC; Hilborn RW; Myers RA
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():169-89. PubMed ID: 12805941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EPA's selenium revision heads into murky waters.
    Renner R
    J Environ Monit; 1999 Aug; 1(4):67N-68N. PubMed ID: 11529153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.