These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12805939)

  • 1. Comparing Clean Water Act Section 316(b) policy options.
    Kadvany J
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():106-38. PubMed ID: 12805939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining "adverse environmental impact" and making paragraph 316(b) decisions: a fisheries management approach.
    Bailey DE; Bulleit KA
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():147-68. PubMed ID: 12805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A holistic look at minimizing adverse environmental impact under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act.
    Veil JA; Puder MG; Littleton DJ; Johnson N
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Apr; 2 Suppl 1():41-57. PubMed ID: 12805978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse environmental impact: 30-year search for a definition.
    Mayhew DA; Muessig PH; Jensen LD
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():21-9. PubMed ID: 12806014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using attainment of the designated aquatic life use to determine adverse environmental impact.
    Seegert G
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():1273-80. PubMed ID: 12805943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A blueprint for the problem formulation phase of EPA-type ecological risk assessments for 316(b) determinations.
    Van Winkle W; Dey WP; Jinks SM; Bevlhimer MS; Coutant CC
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2 Suppl 1():271-98. PubMed ID: 12805899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimizing adverse environmental impact: how murky the waters.
    Super RW; Gordon DK
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2 Suppl 1():219-37. PubMed ID: 12805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A process for evaluating adverse environmental impacts by cooling-water system entrainment at a California power plant.
    Ehrler CP; Steinbeck JR; Laman EA; Hedgepeth JB; Skalski JR; Mayer DL
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():81-105. PubMed ID: 12805938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
    Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
    Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maryland power plant cooling-water intake regulations and their application in evaluation of adverse environmental impact.
    McLean R; Richkus WA; Schreiner SP; Fluke D
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():1-11. PubMed ID: 12806012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indicators of AEI applied to the Delaware Estuary.
    Barnthouse LW; Heimbuch DG; Anthony VC; Hilborn RW; Myers RA
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 May; 2 Suppl 1():169-89. PubMed ID: 12805941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using landscape ecology to focus ecological risk assessment and guide risk management decision-making.
    Kapustka LA; Galbraith H; Luxon BM; Yocum J
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2001 Jun; 17(5-10):236-46. PubMed ID: 12539868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental impacts of dispersed development from federal infrastructure projects.
    Southerland MT
    Environ Monit Assess; 2004 Jun; 94(1-3):163-78. PubMed ID: 15141453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clean Water Act assessment processes in relation to changing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency management strategies.
    Cooter WS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Oct; 38(20):5265-73. PubMed ID: 15543725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposed methods and endpoints for defining and assessing adverse environmental impact (AEI) on fish communities/populations in Tennessee River reservoirs.
    Hickman GD; Brown ML
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2 Suppl 1():204-18. PubMed ID: 12805895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The potential of using the Ecosystem Approach in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive.
    Vlachopoulou M; Coughlin D; Forrow D; Kirk S; Logan P; Voulvoulis N
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():684-94. PubMed ID: 24176715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Assessment system for watershed ecological health in the United States: development and application].
    Zhang H; Luo YM
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Jul; 24(7):2063-72. PubMed ID: 24175541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating modeling, monitoring, and management to reduce critical uncertainties in water resource decision making.
    Peterson JT; Freeman MC
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 2):361-370. PubMed ID: 27012362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conceptual design of monitoring and evaluation plans for fish and wildlife in the Columbia River ecosystem.
    Bisbal GA
    Environ Manage; 2001 Oct; 28(4):433-53. PubMed ID: 11494064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.