These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12806307)
41. Peripheral nerve stimulation for restoration of motor function. Bhadra N; Peckham PH J Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Sep; 14(5):378-93. PubMed ID: 9415385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Energy-efficient waveform for electrical stimulation of the cochlear nerve. Yip M; Bowers P; Noel V; Chandrakasan A; Stankovic KM Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13582. PubMed ID: 29051546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The sciatic nerve of the toad Xenopus laevis as a physiological model of the human cochlear nerve. Morse RP; Evans EF Hear Res; 2003 Aug; 182(1-2):97-118. PubMed ID: 12948606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study. Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19574948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Usefulness of Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess the Functionality of the Cochlear Nerve Using an Intracochlear Test Electrode. Lassaletta L; Polak M; Huesers J; Díaz-Gómez M; Calvino M; Varela-Nieto I; Gavilán J Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e413-e420. PubMed ID: 29076926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Expanding pediatric cochlear implant candidacy: A case study of electro-natural stimulation (ENS) in partial deafness treatment. Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Dziendziel B; Skarzynski PH Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1896-900. PubMed ID: 26384830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Results with the Contour cochlear implant in patients with cochlear otosclerosis]. Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Klenzner T; Laszig R Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Jul; 83(7):457-60. PubMed ID: 15257495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Does exogenous GM1 ganglioside enhance the effects of electrical stimulation in ameliorating degeneration after neonatal deafness? Osofsky MR; Moore CM; Leake PA Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):23-35. PubMed ID: 11520632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Basis of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the cochlear nucleus. Shepherd RK; McCreery DB Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 64():186-205. PubMed ID: 16891843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Deafness in the 20th century. Evolution of clinical otology, prevention and rehabilitation of hearing defects. Felisati D Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2007 Feb; 27(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 17601212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Graham Fraser Memorial Lecture 2002. From frogs' legs to pieds-noirs and beyond: some aspects of cochlear implantation. Graham JM J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Sep; 117(9):675-85. PubMed ID: 14561352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses). Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [A tinnitus case with an implanted electrical tinnitus suppressor]. Matsushima J; Kumagai M; Takahashi K; Sakai N; Inuyama Y; Sasaki Y; Miyoshi S; Ifukube T Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1994 Apr; 97(4):661-7. PubMed ID: 8189313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]