These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12806562)

  • 1. Characteristics of good causation studies.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 12806562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Causality in nephrology: study design and objectives of future research].
    Strippoli GF; Manno C; Schena FP
    G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 14634966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis and causal inference: a case study of benzene and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Weed DL
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 May; 20(5):347-55. PubMed ID: 20382335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
    Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects.
    Schmoor C; Caputo A; Schumacher M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(9):1120-9. PubMed ID: 18334500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What random assignment does and does not do.
    Krause MS; Howard KI
    J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
    Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correction of confounding bias in non-randomized studies by appropriate weighting.
    Schmoor C; Gall C; Stampf S; Graf E
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):369-87. PubMed ID: 21308726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matching.
    Costanza MC
    Prev Med; 1995 Sep; 24(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 8524715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related.
    Weed DL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2000 Jun; 29(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 10869307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A potential bias in safety evaluation during open-label extensions of randomized clinical trials.
    Rothman KJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 May; 13(5):295-8. PubMed ID: 15133780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the impact of the discontinuation of medical interventions on health outcomes.
    Weiss NS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 19126592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.