BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12807102)

  • 1. Anticipatory planning for research participants with psychotic disorders like schizophrenia.
    Backlar P
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):829-53. PubMed ID: 12807102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advance directives for subjects of research who have fluctuating cognitive impairments due to psychotic disorders (such as schizophrenia).
    Backlar P
    Community Ment Health J; 1998 Jun; 34(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 9607160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent to human subject research: improving the process of obtaining informed consent from mentally ill persons.
    Derrickson D
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 25(1):143-65. PubMed ID: 12173638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A choice of one's own research advance directives: anticipatory planning for research subjects with fluctuating or prospective decisionmaking impairments.
    Backlar P
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):117-28. PubMed ID: 11658170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How can valid informed consent be obtained from a psychotic patient for research into psychosis? Three perspectives.
    Freckelton I; Keks N; Howe V; Foister K; Jenkins K; Copolov D; Sullivan D
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):60-75. PubMed ID: 15069966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dementia research: ethics and policy for the twenty-first century.
    Dresser R
    Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):661-90. PubMed ID: 15119320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
    Sundram CJ
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
    Moreno JD
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advance directives in dementia research: promoting autonomy and protecting subjects.
    Dresser R
    IRB; 2001; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12530449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planning for future research participation: ethical and practical considerations.
    Dresser R
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):129-36. PubMed ID: 11658171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
    Ross LF
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulating research with decisionally impaired individuals: are we making progress?
    Hoffmann DE; Schwartz J; DeRenzo EG
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2000; 3(3-4):547-608. PubMed ID: 16594106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
    DeRenzo EG
    IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity--executive summary.
    US National Bioethics Advisory Commission
    J Int Bioethique; 2002 Mar; 13(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15038373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
    National Bioethics Advisory Commission (United States)
    J Int Bioethique; 2002; 13(3-4):173-9. PubMed ID: 12747354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
    Gandhi R
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The forum. Respecting and protecting mentally impaired persons in medical research.
    Fisher CB
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 12656072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The subject advocate: protecting the interests of participants with fluctuating decisionmaking capacity.
    Stroup S; Appelbaum P
    IRB; 2003; 25(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 14569988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The forum. Competence to consent to research: where psychology, ethics, and the law intersect.
    Rosenfeld B
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 12656073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.