These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12807158)

  • 1. Strain distribution within the human femur due to physiological and simplified loading: finite element analysis using the muscle standardized femur model.
    Polgár K; Gill HS; Viceconti M; Murray DW; O'Connor JJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):173-89. PubMed ID: 12807158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and numerical validation of a finite element model of the muscle standardized femur.
    Polgár K; Gill HS; Viceconti M; Murray DW; O'Connor JJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 12807157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modelling.
    Speirs AD; Heller MO; Duda GN; Taylor WR
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(10):2318-23. PubMed ID: 17166504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress and strain distribution in the intact canine femur: finite element analysis.
    Shahar R; Banks-Sills L; Eliasy R
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jun; 25(5):387-95. PubMed ID: 12711236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Integrated Musculoskeletal-Finite-Element Model to Evaluate Effects of Load Carriage on the Tibia During Walking.
    Xu C; Silder A; Zhang J; Hughes J; Unnikrishnan G; Reifman J; Rakesh V
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Oct; 138(10):. PubMed ID: 27437640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of the femur during stance phase of gait based on musculoskeletal model simulation.
    Seo JW; Kang DW; Kim JY; Yang ST; Kim DH; Choi JS; Tack GR
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2485-93. PubMed ID: 25226949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution.
    Duda GN; Heller M; Albinger J; Schulz O; Schneider E; Claes L
    J Biomech; 1998 Sep; 31(9):841-6. PubMed ID: 9802785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral strain during walking predicted with muscle forces from static and dynamic optimization.
    Edwards WB; Miller RH; Derrick TR
    J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1206-1213. PubMed ID: 26994784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur.
    Rudman KE; Aspden RM; Meakin JR
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():12. PubMed ID: 16504005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of muscle activity on the forces in the femur: an in vivo study.
    Lu TW; Taylor SJ; O'Connor JJ; Walker PS
    J Biomech; 1997; 30(11-12):1101-6. PubMed ID: 9456377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral neck strain prediction during level walking using a combined musculoskeletal and finite element model approach.
    Altai Z; Montefiori E; van Veen B; A Paggiosi M; McCloskey EV; Viceconti M; Mazzà C; Li X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245121. PubMed ID: 33524024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of global and joint-to-joint methods for estimating the hip joint load and the muscle forces during walking.
    Fraysse F; Dumas R; Cheze L; Wang X
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2357-62. PubMed ID: 19699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combination of finite element modeling and optimization for the study of lumbar spine biomechanics considering the 3D thorax-pelvis orientation.
    Ezquerro F; Simón A; Prado M; Pérez A
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jan; 26(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 14644594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selecting boundary conditions in physiological strain analysis of the femur: Balanced loads, inertia relief method and follower load.
    Heyland M; Trepczynski A; Duda GN; Zehn M; Schaser KD; Märdian S
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Dec; 37(12):1180-5. PubMed ID: 26521092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a strain rate dependent material model of human cortical bone for computer-aided reconstruction of injury mechanisms.
    Asgharpour Z; Zioupos P; Graw M; Peldschus S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():109-16. PubMed ID: 24529781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptations of trabecular bone to low magnitude vibrations result in more uniform stress and strain under load.
    Judex S; Boyd S; Qin YX; Turner S; Ye K; Müller R; Rubin C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12572652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tissue stresses and strain in trabeculae of a canine proximal femur can be quantified from computer reconstructions.
    Van Rietbergen B; Müller R; Ulrich D; Rüegsegger P; Huiskes R
    J Biomech; 1999 Apr; 32(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 10213036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.