These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12807324)
1. Surveillance of surgical-site infections in orthopedics. Walenkamp G Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Apr; 74(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 12807324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of the surveillance of surgical wound infections: a 10-year prospective study of 12,364 wounds. Ibsen Sørensen A; Sandberg Sørensen T; Bremmelgaard A Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Apr; 74(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12807325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The significance of documentation in clinical routine: we are all in one boat]. Schanz B; Konrad A; Stranz S; Edinger J Pflege Z; 2010 Jul; 63(7):418-21. PubMed ID: 20677691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quality of data on computerized registration of postoperative wound infections]. Bentsen HH; Jensen LP; Håkansson TU Ugeskr Laeger; 1995 May; 157(19):2717-9. PubMed ID: 7770971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automating the monitoring of surgical site infections using variable life-adjusted display charts. Vasilakis C; Wilson AP; Haddad FS J Hosp Infect; 2011 Oct; 79(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 21775015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of two methods for identifying surgical site infections following orthopaedic surgery. Cadwallader HL; Toohey M; Linton S; Dyson A; Riley TV J Hosp Infect; 2001 Aug; 48(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 11461126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of surgical site infection surveillance in orthopedic procedures. Huotari K; Agthe N; Lyytikäinen O Am J Infect Control; 2007 May; 35(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 17482992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using CQI methods to lower postsurgical wound infection rate. Koska MT Hospitals; 1992 May; 66(9):62, 64. PubMed ID: 1572629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Validity of a system for registration of infections]. Jensen P; Haugegaard LM; Thomsen H; Roikjaer O Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Feb; 156(9):1273-5. PubMed ID: 8009749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Development of a new wound documentation system: making quality visible--achieving legal security]. Eberlein T Pflege Z; 2006 Jun; 59(6):359-61. PubMed ID: 16826959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Wired for Health Care Quality Act: beyond HIPAA. Reisman G; Larson SP J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Oct; 5(10):1089-90. PubMed ID: 18812155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The risk related to surgical site infections after hip endoarthroplasty--surveillance outcome analysis in two Polish orthopaedic centres. Wójkowska-Mach J; Bulanda M; Jaje E; Romaniszyn D; Ziółkowski G; Frańczuk B; Gaździk T; Kochan P; Heczko PB Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2009; 11(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 19620743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Central registries in health care. Are they reliable?]. Carlsson P Lakartidningen; 1994 Feb; 91(7):582, 587. PubMed ID: 8114593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ten-year surveillance of nosocomial surgical site infections in an orthopedic surgery department]. Lecuire F; Gontier D; Carrere J; Giordano N; Rubini J; Basso M Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Oct; 89(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 14593284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliable personal health records. Van Deursen T; Koster P; Petković M Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():484-9. PubMed ID: 18487778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Time, medical records and quality assurance--the cost-benefit assessment is a must]. Ericsson M Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(18):2245-6. PubMed ID: 10850056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical wound infection surveillance. Lee JT Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Dec; 128(12):1038-46. PubMed ID: 14750065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]