These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12807400)

  • 21. Mirror image reversal: is what we see what we present?
    Morris RC
    Perception; 1993; 22(7):869-76. PubMed ID: 8115245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigating hemispheric specialization in a novel face-word Stroop task.
    Anes MD; Kruer JL
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 15010245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemispheric asymmetries in reading Korean: task matters.
    Vaid J; Park K
    Brain Lang; 1997 Jun; 58(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 9184098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A directional bias for studies of laterality.
    Alter I; Rein S; Toro A
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 2927635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. English and Hebrew letter report by English- and Hebrew-reading subjects: evidence for stimulus control, not hemispheric asymmetry.
    Lubow RE; Tsal Y; Mirkin A; Mazliah G
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 8043265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Directional scanning effect and strength of reading habit in picture naming and recall.
    Padakannaya P; Devi ML; Zaveria B; Chengappa SK; Vaid J
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):484-90. PubMed ID: 12030493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A functional MRI study of a picture-sentence verification task: evidence of attention shift to the grammatical subject.
    Iwabuchi T; Inui T; Ohba M; Ogawa K
    Neuroreport; 2013 Apr; 24(6):298-302. PubMed ID: 23442439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic stimuli: accentuating aesthetic preference biases.
    Friedrich TE; Harms VL; Elias LJ
    Laterality; 2014; 19(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 24527986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing].
    Hildebrandt H; Fresenborg I; Engel A
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Culturally inconsistent spatial structure reduces learning.
    McCrink K; Shaki S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():20-6. PubMed ID: 27208418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semantics at a glance: is the right hemisphere special?
    Bourassa D; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Dec; 48(4):543-52. PubMed ID: 7866393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Newborns' perception of left-right spatial relations.
    Gava L; Valenza E; Turati C
    Child Dev; 2009; 80(6):1797-810. PubMed ID: 19930352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How initial fixation position influences visual word recognition: a comparison of French and Arabic.
    Farid M; Grainger J
    Brain Lang; 1996 Jun; 53(3):351-68. PubMed ID: 8798333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming.
    Biederman I; Cooper EE
    Perception; 1991; 20(5):585-93. PubMed ID: 1806902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Symbolic control of visual attention: semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention.
    Gibson BS; Scheutz M; Davis GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):363-74. PubMed ID: 19304625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Object shape and orientation do not routinely influence performance during language processing.
    Rommers J; Meyer AS; Huettig F
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 24065373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do the hemispheres interact during object naming? Evidence from tachistoscopic viewing and time-sharing paradigms.
    Rastatter MP; McGuire RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):1019-24. PubMed ID: 1792114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: the effects of task and idiom type.
    Papagno C; Caporali A
    Brain Lang; 2007 Feb; 100(2):208-20. PubMed ID: 16487581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.