These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12807952)

  • 21. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening: results from women in a high-risk province of Costa Rica.
    Schiffman M; Herrero R; Hildesheim A; Sherman ME; Bratti M; Wacholder S; Alfaro M; Hutchinson M; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Lorincz AT
    JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10632285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
    Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) using HPV DNA testing after a diagnosis of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in Catalonia, Spain.
    Ibáñez R; Moreno-Crespi J; Sardà M; Autonell J; Fibla M; Gutiérrez C; Lloveras B; Alejo M; Català I; Alameda F; Casas M; Bosch FX; de Sanjosé S
    BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Jan; 12():25. PubMed ID: 22280073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS).
    Kulasingam SL; Kim JJ; Lawrence WF; Mandelblatt JS; Myers ER; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Goldie SJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 16418511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
    Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
    Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
    Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
    Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contribution of human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture in the triage of women with repeated abnormal pap smears before colposcopy referral.
    Fait G; Kupferminc MJ; Daniel Y; Geva E; Ron IG; Lessing JB; Bar-Am A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11063640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Switch from cytology-based to human papillomavirus test-based cervical screening: implications for colposcopy.
    Porras C; Wentzensen N; Rodríguez AC; Morales J; Burk RD; Alfaro M; Hutchinson M; Herrero R; Hildesheim A; Sherman ME; Wacholder S; Solomon D; Schiffman M
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 130(8):1879-87. PubMed ID: 21607948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
    Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
    Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Sequential Rounds of Cervical Cancer Screening on Management of HPV-positive Women: A 15-year Population-based Cohort Study from China.
    Xu XQ; Rezhake R; Hu SY; Chen F; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Zhang WH; Ma JF; Qiao YL; Zhao FH; Cruickshank M
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Mar; 14(3):363-372. PubMed ID: 33303694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Sellors JW; Lorincz AT; Mahony JB; Mielzynska I; Lytwyn A; Roth P; Howard M; Chong S; Daya D; Chapman W; Chernesky M
    CMAJ; 2000 Sep; 163(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 11006761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A study of cervical cancer screening algorithms].
    Zhao FH; Zhang WH; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Chen W; Liu B; Ma JF; Hu SY; Qiao YL
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 32(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 20819481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Impact of Triage for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance with Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan.
    Fujiwara H; Suzuki M; Morisawa H; Sayama M; Kimura K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jan; 20(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 30678384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
    Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Triage of women with minor abnormal cervical cytology: meta-analysis of the accuracy of an assay targeting messenger ribonucleic acid of 5 high-risk human papillomavirus types.
    Verdoodt F; Szarewski A; Halfon P; Cuschieri K; Arbyn M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Dec; 121(12):675-87. PubMed ID: 23881840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
    Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
    JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.