247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12808582)
1. What random assignment does and does not do.
Krause MS; Howard KI
J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects.
Schmoor C; Caputo A; Schumacher M
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(9):1120-9. PubMed ID: 18334500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.
Pickering RM; Weatherall M
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5445-56. PubMed ID: 17924360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control.
Christenfeld NJ; Sloan RP; Carroll D; Greenland S
Psychosom Med; 2004; 66(6):868-75. PubMed ID: 15564351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A note on randomization and selection bias in maintenance therapy clinical trials.
Greenhouse JB; Meyer MM
Psychopharmacol Bull; 1991; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 1775592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of good causation studies.
Daya S
Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 12806562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of randomized controlled trials.
Stanley K
Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(13):1819-22. PubMed ID: 17404173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
Greenland S
Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
Grimes DA; Schulz KF
Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures.
Berger VW; Ivanova A; Knoll MD
Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3017-28. PubMed ID: 12973784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.
Guimaraes P; Palesch Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 17321219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
Schouten HJ
Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
